"Palmer is a very good QB, but those can be found in most years (Romo, Breese come to mind) and with a bunch of strong RB's someone always seems to have 2 good QB's and will gladly trade one of them for a decent (not great) RB. "
The above comment is baffling to me. You already had a QB who is better than McNabb, in my opinion, even when McNabb was healthy, and he plays for a much better team, with talent that is young as well. I don't get this justification.
"They are a pretty decent, young group, but hardly dominent at this time. With the addition of DeAngelo, I could really have something next year and beyond, when the $$$$ is serious.
"
You are banking a lot on D'Angelo, a guy who has proven nothing, for a guy who is still young, plays for a good team, and IS proven.
While the spirit of the bylaws of the league allow this, to me this trade is crap and the justification is weak. I guess all I am saying is that this may tilt the integrity of the competition this year and possibly next year...