Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

smithkt

Members
  • Posts

    2,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Fan of the
    Giants

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

smithkt's Achievements

Huddler

Huddler (2/4)

3

Reputation

  1. Righty or lefty? Actually, scratch that, I don't really want to know.
  2. Yes, happens all the time. There are other sites that appear to use the same feed that don't have this issue, Here's the missing note:
  3. Looks like they were setup to only score through week 16. DMD will have to fix this and recalculate the final results.
  4. Yeah, I got it. Big John already explained it. Yes, I understand it is a function of the IP Board software and their "Personal Conversation" approach to PMs. It's different and so far, I find it not useful for one to one communication. I recognize it could be more useful when multiple parties are involved. I guess I will just need to get used to it. In the mean time, I find it silly that someone sent me a PM and before I got a chance to respond, they deleted it. It still shows up, but I can not respond directly. It's just not what I am used to.
  5. Some, but even some of the more recent ones are marked as well. So, it seems if the other party clears their messages to make room, I can no longer respond. I also have messages where the other party has "left the conversation". Strange way to manage PMs. Makes them far less useful. If that's the way it is, then so be it. I guess the other party will just have to assume I am ignoring them. I participate on quite a few message boards, and I have never seen any of them handle PMs this way. I guess there is nothing I can do about it, so we can consider this topic closed. Thanks for the insight.
  6. The vast majority of the messages in my PM folders are marked as deleted, making it impossible to reply to them. Since I did not mark them this way, can someone explain what is going on and how to undo this?
  7. Good question. In my opinion, it's a bug in their programming. It's been reported many times. Frankly, there is no reason to allow a partial lineup anyway. Change the setting and it closes the loophole. Case closed.
  8. Do you allow owners to submit partial lineups? I think this is what causes this loophole. If you change the setting not to allow partial lineups, then when it automatically submits last weeks lineup, it will lock the players who have already played into the lineup, while still allowing them to adjust the rest of them.
  9. I don't know when you last used a Yahoo league. You should give it another look. It actually works very well.
  10. I'm in a league on Yahoo. It is a perfectly good league hosting site for what I would consider a "typical" league. Here's the questions that may lead some people to use another service like MFL or RTS? How flexible is the scoring setup? Can you use IDP? Can it handle keeper leagues? Dynasty leagues? Contracts and salaries?
  11. I think it's pretty clear from the clip that he turns around to face the pool, attempts to jump, loses his footing and face plants. He did not simply fall from the ladder as the video description says.
  12. 28.5 points? That must be some fairly generous QB scoring you have. I would think most typical scoring leagues would have netted maybe 14-16 point max from a rather pedestrian performance. I can't imagine how many point Matt Ryan must have produced in your scoring system last week.
  13. Right. Forgot about the flex. In that case all of them are still wrong. The 10 and 12 team leagues are not setup for a flex option.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information