elmanx Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 I've got Deuce McCallister and I want to have his backup in case of injury. I assumed that his backup was Stecker (who I currently have), but I noticed that in the last game A. Smith got 3 carries to Stecker's 1 carry. Can anyone who watched the game put these stats into context? Any thoughts on who will get most of the carries if Deuce goes down? Thanks for any replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziachild007 Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 I would think it would be Smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elmanx Posted September 13, 2005 Author Share Posted September 13, 2005 I would think it would be Smith. 985862[/snapback] I would have thought so too, but all of the depth charts that I have seen on various websites list Stecker as #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 Why does everyone keep spelling Deuce's name "McCallister"????? It's McAllister, people! that is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAYER Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 Stecker is the 3rd down back. Smith is the backup if anything happens to Deuce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primetime9287 Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 Why does everyone keep spelling Deuce's name "McCallister"????? It's McAllister, people! that is all. 985887[/snapback] Why does it really matter? And on a side note...you might want Deuce's backup in case he puts up a 2.3 YPC on a consistent basis lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msaint Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 Why does it really matter? And on a side note...you might want Deuce's backup in case he puts up a 2.3 YPC on a consistent basis lol 986477[/snapback] bingo. while the saints' ol did look impressive against the panthers at times, this is not a denver situation where you can plug'n play with backups. i have deuce, and i'm not spending a waiver pick on his backup should (god forbid) anything happen to deuce. that's what my other rb bench depth is for, i.e. better options than antowain/stecker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeljordan ca Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 Why does everyone keep spelling Deuce's name "McCallister"????? It's McAllister, people! that is all. 985887[/snapback] Yes people get Duce's name right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrpoggs Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 I had Duece last season. When he went down with the ankle, Stecker carried the load. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cordo Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 I had Duece last season. When he went down with the ankle, Stecker carried the load. 987829[/snapback] Last year when Deuce went down, they tried Kijana Carter first and he basically stunk, so Stecker had to be the guy. But they really want him as a special teams player and a change of pace third down back, and really don't want to use him as a 20 carry a game guy -- that's why they signed Smith this offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.