tsmock Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) What does everyone think about D Jackson for N Burleson? I currently have D Jackson and my other WR's are: 1. T Holt 2. L Fitzgerald 3. A Lelie 4. J Galloway We start 2 WR then have a WR/RB spot where I have put T Barber, B Westbrook, C Benson, W Parker. Points are: Receptions 1 pt .1 per yard receiving 6 pts per TD DO it or not?. Edited September 14, 2005 by tsmock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dingos Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 would not do it. Seattle has much more offensive stability than the Viqueens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalFlush Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 definitely keep djax, burleson was the most overrated wr this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 I wouldn't do it either. I've said it all off-season, I won't change my stance now...Nate Burleson is being heavily overrated this year. D-Jax isn't a true stud, but he is the unquestioned #1 in Seattle and should be more consistent than Nate. With the Vikings, I bet you see Nate lead their WRs one week, then Taylor the next, than M-Rob or K-Rob, I just don't believe Nate will be the heavy #1 target each week...he may finish with the best overall numbers of the Viking receivers, but D-Jax will be more consistent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youre Going Down Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Keep DJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.