Big John Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Sounds like the guy for the job right here Raider. 1323309[/snapback] Raider is now Russman. Los G never changed his screenname. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I'm up for the challenge! Gimme the Ravens :doah: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilwoman Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I'd like the challenge - if no one has the Seahawks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youre Going Down Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I would like to give it a shot if I can have the next Superbowl Champs.... The Cards!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripleW64 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 (edited) Looks like we are moving along and filling some slots. UNOFFICIAL AFC Raiders Bills Bengals Ravens Steelers NFC Lions Bears Cardinals Cowboys Seahawks Giants Edited February 14, 2006 by TripleW64 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Why not. I'll take the Steelers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I may be interested in taking the Lambs, (or the Chefs, if you need more AFC) depending on the $$$$$. Me poor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 So how exactly will this work? You have to draft a minimum amount of players from your designated team? What if they keep getting picked before you get a chance to take them yourself and you don't get the minimum? With IDP I see how its a litle easier to get your guys. Team QBs or Individual QBs? Bye week points would carry over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 So how exactly will this work? You have to draft a minimum amount of players from your designated team? What if they keep getting picked before you get a chance to take them yourself and you don't get the minimum? With IDP I see how its a litle easier to get your guys. Team QBs or Individual QBs? Bye week points would carry over? 1323973[/snapback] Those are great questions. I could see problems on the horizon if this isn't addressed. Maybe, you get to pick 6 guys from your team prior to the draft? Not sure if that would really help though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Those are great questions. I could see problems on the horizon if this isn't addressed. Maybe, you get to pick 6 guys from your team prior to the draft? Not sure if that would really help though. 1324016[/snapback] Problem if you have a loaded team, that could be an unfair advantage. We should weigh it based on Huddle pre-season draft rankings. Everyone choose 1 top tier (from thier team first, if no one fron their team is top tier, then they can pick any available). Then 3 from second tier (Same rules apply--or could get a top tier if any are left), and two from third. After the first six are picked, standard drafting ensues. Would that work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Problem if you have a loaded team, that could be an unfair advantage. We should weigh it based on Huddle pre-season draft rankings. Everyone choose 1 top tier (from thier team first, if no one fron their team is top tier, then they can pick any available). Then 3 from second tier (Same rules apply--or could get a top tier if any are left), and two from third. After the first six are picked, standard drafting ensues. Would that work? 1324079[/snapback] I like that rule, but since I am a Lion fan I am going to like it. I think proposals like this should be voted on once we get all the teams if we would want it to be a fair rule for everyone. those teams in the middle will be giving the fairest votes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripleW64 Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Problem if you have a loaded team, that could be an unfair advantage. We should weigh it based on Huddle pre-season draft rankings. Everyone choose 1 top tier (from thier team first, if no one fron their team is top tier, then they can pick any available). Then 3 from second tier (Same rules apply--or could get a top tier if any are left), and two from third. After the first six are picked, standard drafting ensues. Would that work? 1324079[/snapback] I like that rule, but since I am a Lion fan I am going to like it. I think proposals like this should be voted on once we get all the teams if we would want it to be a fair rule for everyone. those teams in the middle will be giving the fairest votes. 1324115[/snapback] I think that rule could work. If I'm understanding this correctly, since I own the Cowboys and they have no Top Tier players, I would be free to select any top Tier player as long as that player's team is not represented in the league. In this case, since KC and SD are vacant I could select LJ or LT2. Would the same rule apply to offense and defense players? For example, if DeMarcus Ware or Roy Williams are ranked as top Tier defensive players, would I have to use my top tier selection on one of them versus getting a stud RB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I think that rule could work. If I'm understanding this correctly, since I own the Cowboys and they have no Top Tier players, I would be free to select any top Tier player as long as that player's team is not represented in the league. In this case, since KC and SD are vacant I could select LJ or LT2. 1324136[/snapback] I don't think this will be the case since all 32 teams will be taken. Maybe more like the guy with SD gets Gates or LT. The 49ers owner gets the leftovers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CEO of the Barefoots Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I will take my second favourite team. I am in with the Packers. Raidernation has my favourite team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I don't think this will be the case since all 32 teams will be taken. Maybe more like the guy with SD gets Gates or LT. The 49ers owner gets the leftovers? 1324152[/snapback] Well, if there are 5 top people in each of the 4 positions (not counting IDP or DEF/ST & K), then there simply aren't enough of tier one players to go around. I had envisioned folks without top tier talent being able to "steal" a loaded team's talent (example SD with LT and Gates, Peyton and Harrison, etc.). But there are serious holes in this theory if there aren't enough players to go around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wirehairman Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 I have been interested in something like this ever since I read this article back in 2002, The 32 Homers League. If they are available, I'd sign up for the Vikings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Put me down for the Eagles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider.Nation Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 holy shucks boys... gone for one day (at work) and this is what happens...lol I will try and get everyone setup right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider.Nation Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 Los Gigantes would you be interested commishing this thing? Since I'm fairly new here, I would like someone established to handle this league and the cash. I just thought the concept was cool so I threw out the suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider.Nation Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 Just a thought? Do you guys want to try and fill 32 teams? Or go with 16 (need 1 more)? It's up to all ya'll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Just a thought? Do you guys want to try and fill 32 teams? Or go with 16 (need 1 more)? It's up to all ya'll. 1324713[/snapback] I was hoping we would do all 32 teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Raider is now Russman. Los G never changed his screenname. 1323411[/snapback] Sorry Big John, I am a bit slow. I don't get the meaning of this post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Sorry Big John, I am a bit slow. I don't get the meaning of this post. 1324765[/snapback] You were referring to someone else as "Raider". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BYoder Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I was hoping we would do all 32 teams. 1324764[/snapback] I was thinking the same thing, but do you think we will be able to fill all 32 teams. It may be hard to find owners for some of the teams (ie: Houston, Cleveland, etc.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 I was hoping we would do all 32 teams. 1324764[/snapback] I'm up for 32 as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.