Pancake Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Didnt realize this: 233 OT drafted in 2005 out of 255 total draftees, or 91% OT. Is this just a blip for 2005 or have most of the recent past drafts gone this route? Link to article: http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/9234537 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Remember that CBS Sportsline runs nfl.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skilly Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Didnt realize this: 233 OT drafted in 2005 out of 255 total draftees, or 91% OT. Is this just a blip for 2005 or have most of the recent past drafts gone this route? Link to article: http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/9234537 1326105[/snapback] The math is wrong. It's supposed to be 23. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 The math is wrong. It's supposed to be 23. 1326122[/snapback] ok. Now that the math portion of the article is all cleared up. WR and CB are the most drafted position in 2005...poor poor fullbacks, they dont get any love in the draft and I also recall that fullback are one of the lowest paid positions. I guess you can always draft a halfback/running back and then bulk him out for a fullback is he's not good enough for RB duties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Yep - should be 23. Here is the 2005 draft broken down into positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.