Seahawks21 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Or I could not be a lazy bum and simply click my mouse a few times and find out for myself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripleW64 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Can I get a quick run-down of Tennessee's free-agency moves?? 1385719[/snapback] IMO, I think TEN made a good decision not to go after Brees (FA) or try to get Culpepper. By not overspending in FA and letting other teams manuever, they have helped themselves in the upcoming draft. Sometimes making no moves is a good thing. And they did get Givens, so he shouild help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Can I get a quick run-down of Tennessee's free-agency moves?? 1385719[/snapback] David Thornton LB and David Givens WR. That's all I know of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks21 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 David Thornton LB and David Givens WR. That's all I know of. 1385739[/snapback] And I thought Hawk fans were delusional!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizards Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Not a Cowboy fan up front here.....but you gotta like their FA pick-ups!!! If they address the "D" in the draft (which I suppose they will) look out NFC East.....IMO their biggest weakness is at RB---Jones & Barber won't get the job done IMo.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 bears are right there with them 1385543[/snapback] Um...we haven't done anything. Don't you have to actually play along to be considered a "winner" or a "loser"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTen Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 <-------------- Read user name 1385655[/snapback] I disagree. I think they have done pretty good. Not only do they sign Kitna, McCown, Cambell and Tucker, they GOT RID OF JOEY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I disagree. I think they have done pretty good. Not only do they sign Kitna, McCown, Cambell and Tucker, they GOT RID OF JOEY 1385937[/snapback] Anr their coaching hires look very good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Panthers have had a great OS FA wise, as the O line is better and the D line is now the leagues best, and Key fills the #2 WR spot. Panthers the NFC favs-no doubt about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I'm not excited or depressed with the Steelers Free Agency, which is par for the course for them. The biggest loss was Antwaan Randle-El, but, I would have been absolutely furious if the Steelers would have paid him anything close to what the bears did. They lost Chris Hope, but, replaced him with Ryan Clark, who I think will do just fine. They also lost Kimo Von Oelhoffen, but, he is getting way up there in the age department, and Brett Keisel has been impressive in his opportunities. He will be a better pass-rusher, but will have to improve against the run, which was Kimo's strong-suit. They did a good job of keeping their own by restructuring with Hartings & Staley. Re-signing Deshea Townsend, keeps a veteran along with a promising young secondary. It appears they will get Verron Haynes re-signed, which I am happy about, as he is a very good 3rd down back and Special Teams player. The only immediate need in the draft, imho, is a Wide Receiver. They also could use a Center to eventually replace Harting, as I don't think they are sold on Okobi doing that job. Though I would like to see them take a WR in Round 1, I have a feeling they take Mangold to be their Center of the future, and grab a receiver later in the draft. Need some depth at DE, Safety, RB, ILB, and might also take a mid to late round flyer on a # 3 QB, and an eventual replacement for Batch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 The biggest loss was Antwaan Randle-El, but, I would have been absolutely furious if the Steelers would have paid him anything close to what the bears did. 1386196[/snapback] Menudo, FYI Antwaan Randle-El signed with the Skins...not the Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Menudo, FYI Antwaan Randle-El signed with the Skins...not the Bears. 1386209[/snapback] After everyone saying for so long that the Bears would sign him, easily confused. The Raiders free agency isn't amazing, but at least they are doing something. Not even bothering to try to re-sign Woodson, releasing Ron Stone, Collins, and Teddy Washington along with picking up Brooks and Poole I think are all positive things that will start to get them going in the right direction. They need to look for one or two more experienced DBs, and a better LB to play alongside Morrison and Clark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 tennessee has signed: David Givens, WR New England Unrestricted Undisclosed Chris Hope, FS Pittsburgh Unrestricted 6 years Kevin Mawae, C N.Y. Jets Other* Undisclosed David Thornton, LB 4 solid players at areas of need, and they haven't wildly overpaid. i'd say they've done a good job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Menudo, FYI Antwaan Randle-El signed with the Skins...not the Bears. 1386209[/snapback] Sorry, I knew that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I like Atlanta's moves of getting Abraham, Milloy & Crocker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted March 24, 2006 Author Share Posted March 24, 2006 Winners: Vikings, Browns, Ravens, RedskinsLosers: Pats, Cowboys (for signing two of the biggest losers on the market) 1385653[/snapback] how'd the eagles do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 (edited) how'd the eagles do? 1386576[/snapback] I don't think they would be in either the Winners or Losers category. The pick up of Gaffney could be interesting, but everything else they have done is not groundbreaking or stupid IMO. Edited March 24, 2006 by TDFFFreak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 You have to play , to win. The Eagles have done almost nothing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Frankly I am not pleased with my Raven's lastest spate of nonsensical signings...and it's starting to look like we're gonna have another year of Kyle Cornholer under center Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.