Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

QB Busts


Dr. Love
 Share

Recommended Posts

As we all know, Joey Harrington is in the process of being run out of town in Detroit. It's always amazed me how much support he's gotten from Lions fans (about a 50-50 split of pro/anti Harrington to begin the 2005 NFL season), and it continues to amaze me how much support he still gets as a lame duck with another season of futility under his belt (maybe 15-25% of fans are of the "Joey will make us all sorry" camp).

 

This leads me to a question. Did other first-round busts enjoy this same sort of support? Was there a significant number of Bears fans sorry to see Cade McNown go? Were there lots of Rick Mirer supporters distraught by the Seahawks decision to get rid of him? Was there a contingent of Bengals fans who thought that Akili Smith wasn't given enough of a chance? Or is Detroit and/or Harrington unique in this respect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Hawks fan I really don't consider Mirer a bust. I don't think he really ever had the talent to warrant where he was drafted. I thought he was a decent college QB who played on a good team. He should have never been put in the position to try to be the savior in Seattle.

 

I still think Joey will end up having the last laugh when it's all said and done. I think he can and will be a very good QB in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dunno, lions fans as a whole seem like a different breed. very...loyal and forgiving, shall we say. (except toward coaches?) and perpetually unrealistically optimistic. i still for the life of me can't figure out how matt millen hasn't been run out of town with his head on a spike. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Hawks fan I really don't consider Mirer a bust.  I don't think he really ever had the talent to warrant where he was drafted.  I thought he was a decent college QB who played on a good team.  He should have never been put in the position to try to be the savior in Seattle. 

 

I still think Joey will end up having the last laugh when it's all said and done.  I think he can and will be a very good QB in the NFL.

 

1394010[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interesting. Any Bengals fans want to chime in? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dunno, lions fans as a whole seem like a different breed.  very...loyal and forgiving, shall we say.  (except toward coaches?)  and perpetually unrealistically optimistic.  i still for the life of me can't figure out how matt millen hasn't been run out of town with his head on a spike.  :D

 

1394025[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JOEY HARRINGTON

Year Team G Cmp Att Pct Yds Yds/Att TD Int

2002 DET 14 215 429 50.1 2294 5.3 12 16

2003 DET 16 309 554 55.8 2880 5.2 17 22

2004 DET 16 274 489 56.0 3047 6.2 19 12

2005 DET 12 188 330 57.0 2021 6.1 12 12

 

Cade McNown

Year Team G Att Comp Yards Lg TD Int

1999 Bears 15 235 127 1465 80 8 10

2000 Bears 10 280 154 1646 68 8 9

 

Akili Smith

Year Team G Att Comp Yards Lg TD Int

1999 Bengals 7 153 80 805 39 2

2000 Bengals 12 267 118 1253 46 3

2001 Bengals 2 8 5 37 14 0

2002 Bengals 1 33 12 117 24 0

 

Rick Mirer

Year His Team G Att Comp Yds Lg TD Int

1993 Seattle 16 486 274 2833 53 12 17

1994 Seattle 13 381 195 2151 51 11 7

1995 Seattle 15 391 209 2564 59 13 20

1996 Seattle 11 265 136 1546 60 5 12

 

This might be difficult to read since everything didn't seam to line up correctly but the basic idea is that Harrington produced better stats than ALL of the other QB's you compared him too. The only player even remotely close is Rick Mirer who still didn't produce the numbers Harrington did. I think these stats speak for themselves...

Edited by TheGrunt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to defend Harrington by comparing him to the actual stats of Michael Vick, as once you wipe away the crappy shoes from spammers hype, Vick is remarkably mediocre and the facts surprise people. :D

 

However, amazingly, Vick is actually a higher rated passer than Joey!!! :D Granted, a career rating of 75 (Vick) is nothing special (Roethlisberger's is 98), but it is better than Harrington (68). Plus, Joey's turnovers are worse than Vick's (that's tough to do) and the Lions haven't won as much as the Falcons have -- even though the Falcons are only one game over .500 during the Vick era. Soooo -- I'll cut Vick some slack today and leave Joey hanging out to dry ... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most fans are tolerant of Joey because the team has had a terrible "D" and it causes a QB to always trek from behind and take risks and chances....you gotta have a decent "O" line to help too.....Lions "O" line has been average if not below average in recent years and the "D" is a definite lameduck in past seasons....Harrington (IMO he's a lameduck) maybe just needs a decent team to command and he could do well.....I'm not holding my breath to see if he gets that chance.......I'll never have Joey as my fantasy QB....and that really is the main issue.....the Lions really have talent at WR...need to upgrade the "O" line and QB and their "O" will be potent ......Harrington does not bring potency to the table....top a piano yes, to the football field....HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JOEY HARRINGTON

Year  Team  G  Cmp  Att  Pct  Yds  Yds/Att  TD  Int   

2002  DET  14  215  429  50.1  2294  5.3    12  16 

2003  DET  16  309  554  55.8  2880  5.2    17  22 

2004  DET  16  274  489  56.0  3047  6.2    19  12 

2005  DET  12  188  330  57.0  2021  6.1    12  12 

 

Cade McNown

Year  Team  G  Att  Comp  Yards  Lg  TD  Int 

1999    Bears 15 235 127 1465 80 8 10

2000 Bears 10 280 154 1646 68 8 9

 

Akili Smith

Year  Team  G  Att  Comp  Yards  Lg  TD  Int 

1999 Bengals 7 153 80  805  39  2

2000 Bengals 12    267    118      1253 46 3

2001 Bengals 2 8  5      37    14      0

2002 Bengals 1 33  12    117    24    0

 

Rick Mirer

Year    His Team                          G      Att      Comp    Yds        Lg  TD Int

1993 Seattle 16 486 274 2833  53  12  17

1994 Seattle 13 381 195 2151  51  11  7

1995 Seattle 15 391 209 2564  59  13  20

1996 Seattle 11 265 136 1546  60  5  12

 

This might be difficult to read since everything didn't seam to line up correctly but the basic idea is that Harrington produced better stats than ALL of the other QB's you compared him too. The only player even remotely close is Rick Mirer who still didn't produce the numbers Harrington did. I think these stats speak for themselves...

 

1394076[/snapback]

 

 

 

I think McNown and Mirer are very comparable.

 

McNown 1st 2 yearsG  GS  Att  Comp  Pct  Yards  YPA  Lg  TD  Int  Tkld  20+  40+  Rate1999	15	6	235	127	54.0	1465	6.23	80	8	10	18/94	18	6	66.72000	10	9	280	154	55.0	1646	5.88	68	8	9	27/169	19	5	68.5Mirer 1st 2 yearsG  GS  Att  Comp  Pct  Yards  YPA  Lg  TD  Int  Tkld  20+  40+  Rate1993	16	16	486	274	56.4	2833	5.83	53	12	17	47/235	32	5	67.01994	13	13	381	195	51.2	2151	5.65	51	11	7	27/145	27	4	70.2Harrington 1st 2 yearsYear  G  GS  Att  Comp  Pct  Yards  YPA  Lg  TD  Int  Tkld  20+  40+  Rate2002	14	12	429	215	50.1	2294	5.35	64	12	16	8/75	28	6	59.92003	16	16	554	309	55.8	2880	5.20	72	17	22	9/55	24	3	63.9---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Harrington 2nd 2 yearsG  GS  Att  Comp  Pct  Yards  YPA  Lg  TD  Int  Tkld  20+  40+  Rate2004	16	16	489	274	56.0	3047	6.23	62	19	12	36/196	43	4	77.52005	12	11	330	188	57.0	2021	6.12	86	12	12	24/136	23	6	72.02005 passer rating rank: #272005 completion % rank:  #35 (excluding <90 attempt QBs, otherwise lower)2005 ypg rank:           #32

 

The first two years of McNown and Mirer look exactly the same as Harrington. And it's not like Joey tore it up in his last two years here. High first round QBs almost always go to crappy teams, so I don't buy that excuse for Harrington either.

 

So my question is still the same: has Harrington actually done anything special to warrant the support he gets, or is there always residual support for high first round quarterbacks because of their college success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most fans are tolerant of Joey because the team has had a terrible "D" and it causes a QB to always trek from behind and take risks and chances....you gotta  have a decent "O" line to help too.....Lions "O" line has been average if not below average in recent years and the "D" is a definite lameduck in past seasons....Harrington (IMO he's a lameduck) maybe just needs a decent team to command and he could do well.....I'm not holding my breath to see if he gets that chance.......I'll never have Joey as my fantasy QB....and that really is the main issue.....the Lions really have talent at WR...need to upgrade the "O" line and QB and their "O" will be potent ......Harrington does not bring potency to the table....top a piano yes, to the football field....HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

 

1394573[/snapback]

 

 

 

Don't high first round QB's generally go to bad teams? That's why they're drafting so high in the first round. McNown didn't get that kind of break.

 

As to your comments on the Lions defense, you're way off base. Time and time again, the defense would get stops only to have the offense go three and out. If the opponents offense controls the ball 2/3 of the game, they're going to score. While the Lions defense could use some upgrades, it has not the unit at fault for the poor showings the last several seasons.

 

I never get the "get Joey a good line, good receivers, and a good running back and he'll be okay" line of reasoning. Don't you draft a QB #3 overall to help the team himself? If you've got Pro Bowlers everywhere else, you could have Trent Dilfer QB your team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never get the "get Joey a good line, good receivers, and a good running back and he'll be okay" line of reasoning.  Don't you draft a QB #3 overall to help the team himself?  If you've got Pro Bowlers everywhere else, you could have Trent Dilfer QB your team.

 

1394578[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

See what you need is a better line to give Harrington more time before he misses the receiver. Then you need a better receiver so that Harrington can miss a more open receiver. Then you need a better defense so Harrington can miss more more open receivers, given that he is on the field more.

 

So, if the Harrington apologists get their way, Harrington will be have more time to throw more passes that miss more more open receivers.

 

:D

Edited by Furd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lions "D" allowed 5,158 total yards last year.....308 First Downs....2040 rushing yards at a 4.2 yards a rush....39 TD's....got only 31 sacks....

 

I didn't say the Lions sucked....although they almost do on defense...I said they are below average and until you can get a decent "D" and a "DECENT" not Pro Bowl....but "DECENT" "O" line.....people will continue to be tolerant of Joey was my point.....as for me...Lions suck and Joey willl "NEVER" be my Fantasy QB back up or otherwise!!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D:D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theres a lot of talk about JP Losman being traded on the Bills message boards. Will it happen? Who knows, but a lot of fans say the Bills should get rid of him. Me? I say keep him. Theres too much invested in him to give up yet, and he cannot be considered a bust YET. Give him at LEAST another year vefore calling him a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information