Avernus Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 Although he is obviously not a long term answer for Philly, I wouldn't mind having him for a year or two. That give Reggie Brown time to develop without a lot of pressure of being the #1 guy. Unless we can get Walker from the Packers I don't see a better option for the Eagles at this point. Unless they know some other receiver will be released soon. 1395645[/snapback] yeah...he's good for a year or two....but I still think he's just about over the hill... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 Although he is obviously not a long term answer for Philly, I wouldn't mind having him for a year or two. That give Reggie Brown time to develop without a lot of pressure of being the #1 guy. Unless we can get Walker from the Packers I don't see a better option for the Eagles at this point. Unless they know some other receiver will be released soon. 1395645[/snapback] I think Moulds would be a perfect fit for the young WR's on Philly too. As you said, he is not long term because of his age, but I think he makes perfect sense for this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 plus I don't know how familiar he is with the WCO... which is why I think they are tageting Walker... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 http://www.790kbme.com/cc-common/mainheadl...&article=395219 says he's a Texan here.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 plus I don't know how familiar he is with the WCO... which is why I think they are tageting Walker... 1395651[/snapback] Part of me thinks they are targetting Walker is because he fired Rosenhaus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 Part of me thinks they are targetting Walker is because he fired Rosenhaus. 1395666[/snapback] ...funny thing is....he's Gaffney's agent... I was shocked when I heard this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 ...funny thing is....he's Gaffney's agent... I was shocked when I heard this... 1395672[/snapback] The saddest thing of all, is Rosenhaus probably gained so many clients after this TO debacle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mggoilers Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 The saddest thing of all, is Rosenhaus probably gained so many clients after this TO debacle. 1395677[/snapback] Rosenhaus did exactly what he said he would do...get T.O. a new deal. He did the same thing with the "Predator" Mckenzie in the New Orleans trade. the process got ugly, but the results are pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 He does not sign with the Eagles ... cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 (edited) He does not sign with the Eagles ... cool. 1395762[/snapback] KS2000, Are you glad Moulds didn't sign with the Iggles because you think he would've made them better? ~ or ~ Are you glad Moulds didn't sign with the Iggles because you think the return, would not have been worth the cost? Not a trick question to bait you into an answer where you can then be unmercifully ridiculed. Honestly curious. Edited March 30, 2006 by Big Score 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 KS2000, Are you glad Moulds didn't sign with the Iggles because you think he would've made them better? ~ or ~ Are you glad Moulds didn't sign with the Iggles because you think the return, would not have been worth the cost? Not a trick question to bait you into an answer where you can then be unmercifully ridiculed. Honestly curious. 1395774[/snapback] The former as he is a Cowboys fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Are you glad Moulds didn't sign with the Iggles because you think he would've made them better? 1395774[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 one more time, for those smart-ass Cowboys fans: 03/30 18:25 Texans: Moulds deal not done yet THE NEWS Despite earlier reports, wide receiver Eric Moulds has not come to terms with the Houston Texans on a restructured contract, according to Harry Henderson, Moulds' agent. WGR 550 AM radio in Buffalo also reported Thursday evening that Bills vice president of communications Scott Berchtold said inital reports of the trade were false. Our View This news doesn't necessarily kill any hopes the Texans have of signing Moulds, but both sides will need to agree on a multi-year deal before the trade can proceed. For the time being, the Eagles are still in the running for Moulds. We'll keep you up to date with any new information as this story develops. See new thread for additional insight from Philly....Mould apparently re-stated he'd rather come to Philly as a #1 option rather than play second-fiddle to AJ in Houston. I wonder how much the Texans want him now???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.