bushwacked Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 How do you explain the number of games the Burleson plays in Minnesota as a factor in his benefit? Total BS. 1399046[/snapback] I think it would benefit him to the tune of 49 million dollars. Seriously though, are Vikings fans really gonna complain about the intent of the Burleson deal when their management did the exact same thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Here's what I said after the Hutchinson signing. The Vikings may have won this round. But it sure looks like the door is opened to more battles down the road. Some of those may come back and bite the Vikes in the butt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 (edited) Now, I agree that what the Vikings did was a bit underhanded, but Brzezinski has been warning the NFL to fix it the past couple years. It was only a matter of time and he saw a chance for the Vikings to benefit because of it. Bad rule (think tuck rule) doesn't mean you blame the team benefitting from it, you blame the system. 1399028[/snapback] no. maybe all the others teams saw the potential can of worms, maybe some of them didn't see it. i'm sure the vikes weren't the ONLY team to see it. either way, all the other teams refrained from f*cking all the other owners, for years and years. because they saw that ultimately it would be a really bad idea for them and for everyone else, except for the players. the shortsighted a-hole vikings are the one and only team that actually OPENED the can of worms. Edited April 2, 2006 by Azazello1313 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.