Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Charges Dismissed Against Culpepper


kryptonite
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...i-sportsnew-hed

 

 

Charges Dismissed Against Culpepper

 

By Associated Press

Published April 4, 2006, 10:27 AM CDT

 

 

MINNEAPOLIS -- Quarterback Daunte Culpepper was cleared Tuesday of misdemeanor charges stemming from a boat party sex scandal.

 

A Hennepin County judge ruled there wasn't probable cause to determine a crime was committed by Culpepper, one of four Minnesota Vikings accused of misdemeanor lewd conduct during the cruise last fall on a suburban lake. Culpepper has since been traded to the Miami Dolphins.

 

Judge Kevin Burke denied a motion to dismiss charges against running back Moe Williams.

 

The other two players charged, cornerback Fred Smoot and tackle Bryant McKinnie, weren't part of Tuesday's ruling. Their next hearings were scheduled for Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Daunte...I hope he can concentrate on football again and hopefully get back to his 2004 form. I would rather he stayed with the Vikes, however, even without the Loveboat scandal it seems there was no getting along between Daunte and the Vikes new coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad the rest of the guys are still going through all of this. I think everybody will be relieved when this is just over and done with. They're misdemeanor charges for cryin' out loud... nobody really cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope

 

were is hook  :D  :D

 

1402806[/snapback]

 

 

 

I don't believe I ever said he was going to be, or deserved to be convicted. I only said that the charges were legit. That's what the courts are for. . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Culpepper and Williams had denied any improper conduct in a hearing before Burke last month. Culpepper, who was accused of touching a dancer's buttocks, testified that he spent the cruise playing a dice game in the back of a boat and rejected offers from several women.

 

Williams, accused of touching a dancer's breast, testified that a woman danced near him but he never touched her.

 

In explaining his ruling, Burke wrote Culpepper's version of events would clear him if true, and since the prosecutor offered nothing to rebut it, he found no probable cause that a crime was committed.

 

The difference with Williams, the judge wrote, was that his story wouldn't necessarily exonerate him because a crew member may have seen the dance and been offended.

 

From espn.com

 

So, if they DID have eyewitnesses to what C-Pep was accused of, he would still be on trial. Do you see the difference? I wasn't debating whether Daunte was guilty or not, only that what he was accused of was a crime. The judge didn't rule that what he was accused of was not criminal. He ruled that there was no evidence that he did it. Do you understand?

 

:D

Edited by CaptainHook
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Culpepper and Williams had denied any improper conduct in a hearing before Burke last month. Culpepper, who was accused of touching a dancer's buttocks, testified that he spent the cruise playing a dice game in the back of a boat and rejected offers from several women.

 

Williams, accused of touching a dancer's breast, testified that a woman danced near him but he never touched her.

 

In explaining his ruling, Burke wrote Culpepper's version of events would clear him if true, and since the prosecutor offered nothing to rebut it, he found no probable cause that a crime was committed.

 

The difference with Williams, the judge wrote, was that his story wouldn't necessarily exonerate him because a crew member may have seen the dance and been offended.

 

From espn.com

 

So, if they DID have eyewitnesses to what C-Pep was accused of, he would still be on trial.  Do you see the difference?  I wasn't debating whether Daunte was guilty or not, only that what he was accused of was a crime.  The judge didn't rule that what he was accused of was not criminal.  He ruled that there was no evidence that he did it.  Do you understand?

 

:D

 

1404021[/snapback]

 

 

 

And I am sure that dice game was absolutely legal too. No illegal betting occurred I am sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Culpepper and Williams had denied any improper conduct in a hearing before Burke last month. Culpepper, who was accused of touching a dancer's buttocks, testified that he spent the cruise playing a dice game in the back of a boat and rejected offers from several women.

 

Williams, accused of touching a dancer's breast, testified that a woman danced near him but he never touched her.

 

In explaining his ruling, Burke wrote Culpepper's version of events would clear him if true, and since the prosecutor offered nothing to rebut it, he found no probable cause that a crime was committed.

 

The difference with Williams, the judge wrote, was that his story wouldn't necessarily exonerate him because a crew member may have seen the dance and been offended.

 

From espn.com

 

So, if they DID have eyewitnesses to what C-Pep was accused of, he would still be on trial.  Do you see the difference?  I wasn't debating whether Daunte was guilty or not, only that what he was accused of was a crime.  The judge didn't rule that what he was accused of was not criminal.  He ruled that there was no evidence that he did it.  Do you understand?

 

:D

 

1404021[/snapback]

 

 

 

:D no but im slow and dont understand how and why he was charged except maybe because he was a black athlete... and someone was looking for a pay day which aint coming :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Culpepper was completely exonerated of all charges here.

 

We're not talking about Culpepper being found not guilty, which is the ruling when there is not enough evidence to convict beyond a shadow of a doubt.

 

We're not even talking about Culpepper being found innocent, which is the ruling for complete vindication of charges after a trial.

 

Fact is, we're talking about the charges against Culpepper being thrown out altogether. There simply wasn't any evidence for the case to go to trial.

 

"Since no evidence was presented to refute this testimony" (the Judge's own words) Judge Kevin Burke outright dismissed the charges against Culpepper.

 

If it were truly a legitimate case, you'd think the prosecutor would have had some evidence for the case to proceed to trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am sure that dice game was absolutely legal too.  No illegal betting occurred I am sure.

 

1404273[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

Didn't know this place was frequented by boy scouts and altar boys.

 

Wow.

 

If somebody ever found out my gambling habits or the amount of times I've gotten a lap dance I'd be doing LIFE in prison without the possibility of parole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't know this place was frequented by boy scouts and altar boys.

 

Wow.

 

If somebody ever found out my gambling habits or the amount of times I've gotten a lap dance I'd be doing LIFE in prison without the possibility of parole.

 

1404367[/snapback]

 

 

 

It was not a serious post jerkey!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it's time to move on.  Just like the Packers have closet poopers and prom thugs, The Vikings will be connected to lap dancing and whizinators.

1404459[/snapback]

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information