Coffeeman Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 I'd agree that only Texas and Oregon should challenge them - losing to anyone else would be an absolute shame. This is a good illustration of why ND gets major props if they can go through their season with only 1-2 losses, versus most other schools needing to go undefeated to get a shot at the NC. Can the Sooners even get up enuf for those other games, so as to not get surprised? That's the question... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codwagon Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 Actually, I took the schedule right from ESPN and they didn't list the game under either team's schedule. But the omission doesn't effect the fact that their out of conference schedule is still weak. As for looking unbiased and intelligent - I've tried that before and it doesn't work in a discussion with Big 12 fans. They haven't the faintest knowledge of "unbiased" or "intelligent". 1459722[/snapback] I agree that their noncon schedule is very weak. Why any school would play two PAC-10 teams when they didn't have to is beyond me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 (edited) I agree that their noncon schedule is very weak. Why any school would play two PAC-10 teams when they didn't have to is beyond me. 1460418[/snapback] I'm not a Pac-10 fan, but I disagree. Just pick two or three teams from the top half of the conference. I'd rather see a team play USC, UCLA or a Stanford than a UAB or MTSU. Edited May 10, 2006 by Dragon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeeman Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 For you non Pac-10ers, an interesting team this year will be Arizona. The 'Cats played USC tough last year for 3 quarters in L.A., and the 'other Stoops' has his program on the rise. Lots of speed in key positions... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 For you non Pac-10ers, an interesting team this year will be Arizona. The 'Cats played USC tough last year for 3 quarters in L.A., and the 'other Stoops' has his program on the rise. Lots of speed in key positions... 1460474[/snapback] Holllaaaaaaaa- have been waiting for lil Stoops to get it going. Tuitama looks to be a stud, Stoops is proving he can recruit some bigtime athlestes. Now..... the next step is to become a good game coach, I am not so sure he is good managing, adjusting a gameplan. And yes, Private Ryan- a bet on the OU/OU game sounds good- I really see no way the Sooners go in to Autzen and win- that place is brutal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted May 10, 2006 Author Share Posted May 10, 2006 Holllaaaaaaaa- have been waiting for lil Stoops to get it going. Tuitama looks to be a stud, Stoops is proving he can recruit some bigtime athlestes. Now..... the next step is to become a good game coach, I am not so sure he is good managing, adjusting a gameplan. And yes, Private Ryan- a bet on the OU/OU game sounds good- I really see no way the Sooners go in to Autzen and win- that place is brutal. 1460536[/snapback] Cool, we have a bet. How bout from after the game until the end of the bowls. Then Brian can have from Jan 4 2007 to Jan 4 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 LMMFAO, care to make a sig line bet on that. Somehow I seriously doubt you believe a word you just typed. You are the ultimate stalker, yet are nutless. This will be no different. 1 yr sigline bet, on OU winning over 9 games, like you just said. If its 9 games, you win, 10 or more, I win. How could such a weak offense win more than 9 games. 1459654[/snapback] Because they play ........... No One! Hello :doah: ...................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Cool, we have a bet. How bout from after the game until the end of the bowls. Then Brian can have from Jan 4 2007 to Jan 4 2008 1460568[/snapback] Put down the Miller Lite's - what are you talking about? I am talkin a bet on the Okl/Oregon game. Not some win/loss over under Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted May 12, 2006 Author Share Posted May 12, 2006 Put down the Miller Lite's - what are you talking about? I am talkin a bet on the Okl/Oregon game. Not some win/loss over under 1463095[/snapback] Right, we have a bet on the game. Loser wears the others sig until Jan 4. That win/loss is for Brian who popped off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWPFFL BrianW Posted May 13, 2006 Share Posted May 13, 2006 Sarge you got a bet. Just to clarify... if Oklahoma loses a game they should have won... then it still counts as a loss. I just wanted to get that out of the way, since you are by far the biggest king of excuses around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted May 13, 2006 Author Share Posted May 13, 2006 Sarge you got a bet. Just to clarify... if Oklahoma loses a game they should have won... then it still counts as a loss. I just wanted to get that out of the way, since you are by far the biggest king of excuses around. 1466056[/snapback] Very Cool, Wildcat and I bet Oregon/OU game, with the loser wearing the others sig until Jan 4, 2007 Brian and I bet OU wins 10 or more games I win, 9 or less he wins sig for 1 yr, from Jan 4 2007 to Jan 4 2008. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbmcdonald Posted May 13, 2006 Share Posted May 13, 2006 I'd agree that only Texas and Oregon should challenge them - losing to anyone else would be an absolute shame. 1460257[/snapback] I think that you people need to take another look at OU's schedule. You are forgetting that they have to play AT Stillwater, and AT Waco. Oh wait; they only have trouble with Baylor in Norman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWPFFL BrianW Posted May 13, 2006 Share Posted May 13, 2006 I think OU has problems with Oregon and Texas for sure, and then 2 others sneak up on them. I realize im the underdog in the bet due to the consistantly weak schedule OU plays but all this team ever does is disappoint. Besides everyone knows, that eventually the Big 12 North won't be as incrediblly bad as it has been in the past 2-3 years, and the balance will at least go in the direction of being more even. I've already said, I think Nebraska will win the Big 12 in 06, so maybe the balance starts to shift this year. Not saying the North will be better, but I don't think it will be a complete mis match. OU didn't show me anything last year, and the one player they got, Peterson, by sarges own admission, he questions his durability at the college level. I agree with him. He's very fragile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.