Swiss Cheezhead Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I find enjoyment in the intensity of it all. 1473130[/snapback] You mean the homo-erotic hazing or the humorous questionairres? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhino Posted May 17, 2006 Author Share Posted May 17, 2006 Self-nominations are now closed. Questioning will commence in the next couple days. Thanks to all the volunteers. We have a strong slate. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 You mean the homo-erotic hazing or the humorous questionairres? 1473136[/snapback] Anything involving "homo" activity gets my pants tight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTice Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Actually...... I think you would get more value by keeping Droughns for a 9th than TO for a 1st, given TO's track record the past couple of years. I would probably go with Jackson, Droughns, and either M. Jones (10) or Brady (7) for my 3rd keeper. Thought about the possibility of keeping M. Jones here too, but I think I would go with the two keepers I mentioned Agree with your strategy on team 2, but I would keep Evans (6) before Edwards (5). Might consider keeping both and starting with 3 WR keepers. I considered this same scenario too. After some thought, would maybe have to do all 3. Team 3 has a lot of options, but I wouldn't consider keeping Roy Williams to be one of them. That guy has burned me too many times, and I would have to imagine that he could be had next year later than the 3rd round in most drafts. I might even consider trading Alexander to someone for another stud (to take advantage of the pro-trade clause) and get that stud at the price of a 2nd round pick, thus allowing yourself to keep Portis (1), Stud #2 (2), and either Fitz (6), Jones (10), Dayne (10), or Rhodes (10). In fact, this team has so much keeper potential, I would probably try to deal a couple of the guys above for future picks, rather than let them go to "waste" and re-enter the draft pool, where guys like Jones, Dayne, and Rhodes might be drafted in rounds 2-4 as opposed to being kept for a 10th. The only problem here is that anyone trading for Alexander would be doing a 1 year rental on him, so you aren't going to get his true worth in trade. I understand your getting burned by Williams, but he has the talent to dominate in a man among boys kinda way. I would keep him. Edit: Although, your original idea of trading Portis for a second 1st (if that makes sense), and keeping Alexander (1), Fitz (6), and Jones (10) looks very intriguing. 1473083[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Anything involving "homo" activity gets my pants tight. 1473730[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 1473760[/snapback] Fair enough.... I guess it's a good thing people's opinions differ. Otherwise, drafts would be pretty boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.