Randall Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Will it hurt LJ's value? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scourge Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 No, John was average at best last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 LJ2 doesn't need no freakin' O'line to rush for 2,000 yards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 LJ2 doesn't need no freakin' O'line to rush for 2,000 yards. Kyle Turley will take his spot and probably play better than John, if anything I see this as not that big of a deal at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 LJ2 doesn't need no freakin' O'line to rush for 2,000 yards. Jordan is on KC!?.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Kyle Turley will take his spot and probably play better than John, if anything I see this as not that big of a deal at all. he'll be the 2nd TE in the 2 TE sets unless he puts on alot of weight..... this I would like to see, though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Jordan is on KC!?.... LaMont Jordan came into the league before Larry Johnson. LaMont Jordan got a starting RB gig before Larry Johnson. Therefore; LaMont Jordan = LJ Larry Johnson = LJ2 Same as Lawrence Taylor came into the league and was a starter, before Landainian Tomnlinson. Lawrence Taylor = LT Landainian Tomnlinson = LT2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 he'll be the 2nd TE in the 2 TE sets unless he puts on alot of weight..... this I would like to see, though... Turley was signed by the Chiefs to play O'line, not TE. He's 265lbs now. He doses himself with lots of HGH and he'll be up to 290lbs - 300lbs by September, no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I bet Turley is doing nothing but eating pancakes, peanut butter and pasta between now and the end of August... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 he'll be the 2nd TE in the 2 TE sets unless he puts on alot of weight..... this I would like to see, though... He was signed to play Oline, not TE. Like Muck said he will put on the weight and the CHiefs Oline will still be the best in the NFL again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 He was signed to play Oline, not TE. Like Muck said he will put on the weight and the CHiefs Oline will still be the best in the NFL again. The mega doses of HGH he'll be quaffing, will help too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 The mega doses of HGH he'll be quaffing, will help too Yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 LaMont Jordan came into the league before Larry Johnson. LaMont Jordan got a starting RB gig before Larry Johnson. Therefore; LaMont Jordan = LJ Larry Johnson = LJ2 Same as Lawrence Taylor came into the league and was a starter, before Landainian Tomnlinson. Lawrence Taylor = LT Landainian Tomnlinson = LT2 we spoke about this before.... Johnson established himself before Jordan did..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Turley was signed by the Chiefs to play O'line, not TE. He's 265lbs now. He doses himself with lots of HGH and he'll be up to 290lbs - 300lbs by September, no problem. KFFL said he was signed as a TE for 2TE sets...but now they won't let me see the up to the minute updates except for the Turley signing on the front page (irony) and they have him listed as a RT...... when they originally listed the signing...they said he'd start as a TE and possibly play the OL if he put some weight on.....but was signed as a TE..... now they have a quote of somebody saying he'll compete for the RT position.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Will it hurt LJ's value? Unexpected but I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) we spoke about this before.... Johnson Jordan established himself before Jordan Johnson did..... You had this bass ackwards Avernus, but I've fixed it for you. LaMont Jordan +--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2001 nyj | 16 | 39 292 7.5 1 | 7 44 6.3 1 || 2002 nyj | 14 | 84 316 3.8 3 | 17 160 9.4 0 || 2003 nyj | 16 | 46 190 4.1 4 | 11 101 9.2 0 || 2004 nyj | 16 | 93 479 5.2 2 | 15 112 7.5 0 || 2005 oak | 14 | 272 1025 3.8 9 | 70 563 8.0 2 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 76 | 534 2302 4.3 19 | 120 980 8.2 3 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ Larry Johnson +--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2003 kan | 6 | 20 85 4.2 1 | 1 2 2.0 0 || 2004 kan | 10 | 120 581 4.8 9 | 22 278 12.6 2 || 2005 kan | 16 | 336 1750 5.2 20 | 33 343 10.4 1 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 32 | 476 2416 5.1 30 | 56 623 11.1 3 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ Edited June 17, 2006 by Big Score 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Name Is Jimmy Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Unexpected but I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Name Is Jimmy Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 You had this bass ackwards Avernus, but I've fixed it for you. What was your big score, cocaine, heroin, crank, LSD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 What was your big score, cocaine, heroin, crank, LSD? Run along and play now little Jimmy. The grown ups are talking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 okay.....both backs were the drafted as the successor to the starter....one was let go as a FA for the older version.... if Johnson were to start at the time...he was projected to be a #1...Jordan was projected around 16th if not worse...unless you were me, Avernus lol but enough tooting my own horn....uhh...Jordan just isn't LJ....he's not as good and they both really became starters pretty much the same time... Jordan just can't be LJ.....that is just absurd...he's the inferior back...it's not like they were seperated by a decade plus in playing time... plus Johnson is on track to become a HoF'er if he keeps this up...Jordan will not... this is the reason for my Johnson = LJ and Jordan = LJ2.......when I think LJ2, I think Jordan..... plus I started the LJ2 thing in the CCS poll anyways....dammit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 What was your big score, cocaine, heroin, crank, LSD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 okay.....both backs were the drafted as the successor to the starter....one was let go as a FA for the older version.... if Johnson were to start at the time...he was projected to be a #1...Jordan was projected around 16th if not worse...unless you were me, Avernus lol but enough tooting my own horn....uhh...Jordan just isn't LJ....he's not as good and they both really became starters pretty much the same time... Jordan just can't be LJ.....that is just absurd...he's the inferior back...it's not like they were seperated by a decade plus in playing time... plus Johnson is on track to become a HoF'er if he keeps this up...Jordan will not... this is the reason for my Johnson = LJ and Jordan = LJ2.......when I think LJ2, I think Jordan..... plus I started the LJ2 thing in the CCS poll anyways....dammit... I wonder what you'd be saying if it were LaMont Jordan behind that line... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I wonder what you'd be saying if it were LaMont Jordan behind that line... but he isn't....what if Edgerrin James were behind the line? plus Jordan wouldn't be nearly as explosive as Johnson is....I've never seen Jordan run like Johnson does...he punches defenders on the mouth... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Hey, I like your discussion here, but did I read HOF and Larry Johnson in the same sentence? Even a rooster doesn't crow that early.. let's at least let the guy start a 16 game season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Hey, I like your discussion here, but did I read HOF and Larry Johnson in the same sentence? Even a rooster doesn't crow that early.. let's at least let the guy start a 16 game season. Jordan won't make the HoF...LJ is entering his 4th season I believe and if he kept this pace...as I said....he would make it... nothing wrong with that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.