AquaticRay Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 man, you are being a little hard on skins, dontcha think? Do not know skins - does he post a lot to say nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Cheezhead Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecerwin Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Do not know skins - does he post a lot to say nothing. You know Skins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Do not know skins You have just defined newbie. But, now that you have been introduced to him, your progression from newbie to momo fektard has begun. After a couple of months at this level, you will either become a Huddler or just a fektard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Maybe I'm in the minority, but as long as someone is willing to back up whatever argument s/he is making and keep things above the belt, I have no problem with them no matter their post count. Of course, someone I've "known" for awhile on the board deciding to be an ass hole will get a bit more rope to hang themselves with than somebody with 100 posts. People with low post counts should also be very selective in their use of sarcasm. I recall going about 30 rounds with BigScore on the Raiders last year - Norv Turner's passing offense, LaMont Jordan, etc - both of us backing up our positions with all sorts of numbers and never taking a legitimate difference of opinion personally, and it increased my respect for the guy, even though he was totally wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh B Tool Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Newbie is okay, we have all been one here I think. Now, that said if you become a New B Tool you won't live it down for a long time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABearWithFurniture Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 You might be a newbie if...'your Huddle user name and email address are one and the same' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecerwin Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 You might be a newbie if...'your Huddle user name and email address are one and the same' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_the_builder Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 You might be a newbie if...'your Huddle user name and email address are one and the same' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 Do not know skins - does he post a lot to say nothing. No. And you will learn to love me. Plus, I have a hot girlfriend here at the Huddle named H8 who poses as a redneck but is really a smokin hot tranny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holy Roller Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 No. And you will learn to love me. Plus, I have a hot girlfriend here at the Huddle named H8 who poses as a redneck but is really a smokin hot tranny. God, I'm laughing so hard, I'm crying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 My best definition for a noob is someone who has not yet found his or her niche here...someone who still doesn't know quite how to fit in, despite post counts, longevity etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cliaz Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 when I think about newbies I touch myself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbmcdonald Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 You might be a newbie if...'your Huddle user name and email address are one and the same' That's it? That is why I kill more threads than a fat woman at a sag-harbour shop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 I recall going about 30 rounds with BigScore on the Raiders last year - Norv Turner's passing offense, LaMont Jordan, etc - both of us backing up our positions with all sorts of numbers and never taking a legitimate difference of opinion personally, and it increased my respect for the guy, even though he was totally wrong. Exsqueeze me Chavez? I was totally wrong? I just about nailed his rushing yards to a T and only missed his total TD's by 2. I see Jordan with right around a 1,000 yds rushing and 7 to 9 TD's total.My .02..........for what it's worth. Lamont Jordan Rushing +--------------------------+ | Rushing | +----------+-----+--------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+| 2005 oak | 14 | 272 1025 3.8 9 | +----------+-----+--------------------------+ Blew it big time on his recieving numbers though. maybe another 200 yds in the passing game Of course NOBODY projected the receiving numbers Jordan ended up with. And I mean nobody! Lamont Jordan Recieving +-------------------------+ | Receiving |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| 2005 oak | 14 | 70 563 8.0 2 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+ Link to my post that the above quotes are pulled from I also told both you and DMD (in the now infamous Porter ~ vs ~ Burleson thread) that I figured Norv would produce a pair of 1,000 yard receivers with Moss & Porter. Misssed that by that projection by only 58 yards. Also told you the Raiders D would suck...and boy did they suck. Tell you what, if that's being wrong, then I can only hope to be soooo wrong more often...ya Newbie Tool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 Tell you what, if that's being wrong, then I can only hope to be soooo wrong more often...ya Newbie Tool! Actually, to be correct, Chavez has been around long enough that he is at momo fektard level. Some may say he has actually progressed to just plain fektard, but that is debateable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 newb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 Actually, to be correct, Chavez has been around long enough that he is at momo fektard level. Some may say he has actually progressed to just plain fektard, but that is debateable. Oh! My bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 Exsqueeze me Chavez? I was totally wrong? I just about nailed his rushing yards to a T and only missed his total TD's by 2. Lamont Jordan Rushing +--------------------------+ | Rushing | +----------+-----+--------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+| 2005 oak | 14 | 272 1025 3.8 9 | +----------+-----+--------------------------+ Blew it big time on his recieving numbers though. Of course NOBODY projected the receiving numbers Jordan ended up with. And I mean nobody! Lamont Jordan Recieving +-------------------------+ | Receiving |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| 2005 oak | 14 | 70 563 8.0 2 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+ Link to my post that the above quotes are pulled from I also told both you and DMD (in the now infamous Porter ~ vs ~ Burleson thread) that I figured Norv would produce a pair of 1,000 yard receivers with Moss & Porter. Misssed that by that projection by only 58 yards. Also told you the Raiders D would suck...and boy did they suck. Tell you what, if that's being wrong, then I can only hope to be soooo wrong more often...ya Newbie Tool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 when I think about newbies I touch myself How did I know that was coming? I must not be a newb anymore! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 10 yards for Illegal use of :fish: icon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 You should give yourself at least 5 for overreacting despite the presence of a icon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 10 yards for Illegal use of :fish: icon Actually, use of the flag throwing icon is reserved for The Referee only. If ya weren't such a newb you would know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 You should give yourself at least 5 for overreacting despite the presence of a icon. Hey, there I was all proud of my call on Lamont Jordan and shiznit... ...then you go and rain on my parade...even with the icon. I guess a 5 yard overreaction is in order, even though I ended my own post with a icon. Truce? Unitl our next debate that is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 Actually, use of the flag throwing icon is reserved for The Referee only. If ya weren't such a newb you would know that. Thinking of changing user name...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.