rew70 Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 I offered Fitz for Maroney and also said bush could be a consideration with Fitz. His reply was fitz for Maroney alone, probably not but both fitz and Bush for Maroney maybe. He may rather part with Foster or T. Bell. So my question, is Fitz and Bush too much for Maroney? Or I could do Fitz for Foster or Bell. I am not real high on Foster and Fitz and Bush would be too much for either of those guys, right? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 Where's my help fellas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 with your WRs I can't see you parting with Fitzgerald. Try to get Bell or Foster off him to upgrade your RB w/o giving up Fitz. See mine on boldin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 with your WRs I can't see you parting with Fitzgerald. Try to get Bell or Foster off him to upgrade your RB w/o giving up Fitz. See mine on boldin I've gone back and forth with this guy. Fitz is the only guy he really wants. I'm not real high on him with leinart at QB. Anyone else think this is crazy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Is this a keeper league or dynasty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 with your WRs I can't see you parting with Fitzgerald. Try to get Bell or Foster off him to upgrade your RB w/o giving up Fitz. See mine on boldin I'm with him.I don't think you can afford to let Fitz go.If he likes Bush maybe you can work something out for a better back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 Is this a keeper league or dynasty? No just a redraft league. Thanks Hugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 No just a redraft league. Thanks Hugh Well, that makes it a little more interesting. But essentially, you're giving up a very good WR who happens to be underachieving and in a bit of a QB quandry (although this is less important because Fitz did very well last year with McCown at QB) and an RB with some upside for and RB with some upside whose value right now is sky high coming off a HUGH week. Keep in mind, Maroney is the #2 RB in a RBBC. Bad trade for you by a long way. Trade high, not low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 Can anyone else help with some opinions? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuke'em ttg Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 i'd keep Fitz ...your rb's don't look that bad..........sure Maroney is comin off a good week but i've played that Patriot scoring roulette with dillon,wr's,te's hoping it would land on my guy..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tesdms Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Fitz and Bush are to much for Maroney. You should keep Fitz based on your WR situation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Rugby Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Keep Fitz. Last week was a good indication of what Maroney is capable of, but don't expect that each week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.