polksalet Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Who wants some? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crispirons Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 f'n (f)ag's. cost me a four team moneyline with rutgers+110, wake forest+155, and smu -160. that turnover when the mizzou player was running into the end zone was a 7 pt swing. nice stupid ass coach going for fake field goal too. can't turn the ball over 4 times and expect to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polksalet Posted October 14, 2006 Author Share Posted October 14, 2006 Do not be on or against the ags this season. I thought I had all of this laid out in the previous thread? I would not be on them against South Dakota nor would I bet against them on USC. Noone has a clue what is going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 (edited) We looked better then I expected today. Still problems on defense but you had to like how the offense looked. Unbelievable domination in TOP (41:30 to 18:30) and winning the turnover battle was key. That OU game at Kyle Field just got allot more interesting. Edited October 15, 2006 by myhousekey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Douche Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 If the Aggies can't hang with OU at Kyle field, then there is a serious problem. The loss of Bomar hurt bad...Peterson just kills us. It's one thing to lose your RB...but to lose the best in the game is devastating. Obviously OU has better talent...as they should. But they are going into this game seriously hobbled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polksalet Posted October 15, 2006 Author Share Posted October 15, 2006 You said "Obviously OU has better talent" Change that to "Obviously OU had better talent" Jorvorskie for Heisman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Shut up, liberal child-molester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polksalet Posted October 16, 2006 Author Share Posted October 16, 2006 If you must call me names, please do not use redundant terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 That would be "conservative child-molestor" in that case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.