Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Also, for the Roethlisberger haters, here are his numbers in the last two games. Keep in mind that all but two of his passes and 12 of his yards were in the first half of those games. I think his early problems had to do with his lack of reps in camp: Over the past two games, Roethlisberger completed 32 of 41 passes for 476 yards, five touchdowns and no interceptions. That produced a near-perfect passer rating of 154.62 with an average gain per attempt of 11.6 yards, about double what he had through his first three games. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06298/732710-66.stm Big Ben appears ready to roll again at QB His medical tests come back OK Wednesday, October 25, 2006 By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Not only are the chances good Ben Roethlisberger will start in Oakland Sunday, he might even return to practice when the Steelers begin preparing today for the Raiders. "We'll see how he feels," coach Bill Cowher said yesterday. After all, what's a little smack to the head by a 277-pound defensive end after you've been splattered all over Second Avenue? Roethlisberger keeps on ticking, through a broken face from his June 12 motorcycle accident, a Sept. 3 appendectomy and now a mild concussion from Sunday's game in Atlanta. Yesterday, he acknowledged he's tired of visiting doctors after enduring a series of tests Sunday night and Monday in which he came through with another passing grade. "He had an MRI done on his brain and neck. Both of those came back normal," Cowher said. "We also did the impact test, the concussion test. We're very encouraged by the results. We'll monitor his progress as the week goes on." And, in case anyone missed it, Cowher repeated, "Again, I emphasize that we're very encouraged by where he's at as we speak today." Cowher officially will list his quarterback as "questionable" on the injury list today and that officially means he has a 50 percent chance of playing. Unofficially, it's probably up to the quarterback himself, and he has a history of going full steam ahead. So, after another glitch, Roethlisberger can try to maintain the momentum he has had the past two weeks before Atlanta's Chauncey Davis played helmet tag with him in the third quarter Sunday, which should wind up being a costly game for the Falcons' defensive end when the NFL announces his fine this week. Over the past two games, Roethlisberger completed 32 of 41 passes for 476 yards, five touchdowns and no interceptions. That produced a near-perfect passer rating of 154.62 with an average gain per attempt of 11.6 yards, about double what he had through his first three games. "Obviously we've been throwing the ball very well and not turning it over," Cowher said. "I think that's a big thing. We've cut down on the interceptions." Roethlisberger seemed to be a different quarterback the past two games than he was in his first three, which came after he missed the opener because of his appendectomy. He threw seven interceptions in those three games and no touchdowns. "He's looked very comfortable and the receivers have done a good job running crisp routes," Cowher said. "I see us throwing the ball before a guy gets out of a break. And that's when I know we're starting to get our timing back. "That's been a carryover from practices -- they've gotten better from that standpoint. He's played well and our offense has played well the last couple of weeks." Roethlisberger's agent, Ryan Tollner, explained that entering his third season Roethlisberger wasn't just trying to get over the injuries from his motorcycle accident and then the appendectomy. He wanted to improve upon his first two seasons in the league, to become a better quarterback than he was last season. In the past two games, Roethlisberger did that. Will his latest crash course derail that, or will it be just another bump in the road? While Roethlisberger passed all the necessary medical tests, he must pass them again before he suits up in Oakland. "He took the test and will take the test again later in the week to make sure he is cleared medically before we would subject him to playing," Cowher said. "But we are encouraged by where he was yesterday and how he felt today. But again, it's too early to make a final decision on that. We will definitely do so by taking all necessary precautions to make sure he is cleared." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Copeman Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 While he's been playing alot more like himself lately, I still think they should play Batch against Oakland. Ben needs to rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 While he's been playing alot more like himself lately, I still think they should play Batch against Oakland. Ben needs to rest. No kidding. They need to sit Ben down while the schedule is easy. Why risk him against Oakland? Batch is capable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 @ non-blinded homers being called "haters"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FishFreak Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 No kidding. They need to sit Ben down while the schedule is easy. Why risk him against Oakland? Batch is capable. Agreed. Plus as a Ward owner, Batch seems to be hitting Ward more often. Give Ben a week off and let Hines continue his hot streak this week at Oakland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 While he's been playing alot more like himself lately, I still think they should play Batch against Oakland. Ben needs to rest. Not that long ago when there was a concussion, the recommendation by team doctors was to rest the player the following week so he can have a fuller recovery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 @ non-blinded homers being called "haters"... Which of us is being blind in not seeing that he put up over 200 yards in the 1st half of each of his last two games, including 5 TD's and 0 INT's ???? Let me guess, it was the running game and defense (which were both poor) that allowed this to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) I watched NFL live last night on ESPN, they said the same exact thing I said, he needs to sit and make sure he is OK down the stretch, you know, like the rest of his life and career. edit ` nevermind... Edited October 25, 2006 by H8tank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Not that long ago when there was a concussion, the recommendation by team doctors was to rest the player the following week so he can have a fuller recovery. Agreed. There's no reason for Ben to play when Batch has played well against the MIA and ATL defenses this season. The Raiders should be a cake-walk for Batch... and just about every other QB in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengal Mania Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Which of us is being blind in not seeing that he put up over 200 yards in the 1st half of each of his last two games, including 5 TD's and 0 INT's ???? Let me guess, it was the running game and defense (which were both poor) that allowed this to happen. I've finally come around to your way of thinking about Ben. He is the best QB in the history of professional football. I don't know how I didn't realize it in your first 500 posts extolling his greatness, but something hit me in this 501st one. Mark me down as the newest Ben-Believer. Please, keep the Ben posts coming, I can't get enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 I've finally come around to your way of thinking about Ben. He is the best QB in the history of professional football. I don't know how I didn't realize it in your first 500 posts extolling his greatness, but something hit me in this 501st one. Mark me down as the newest Ben-Believer. Please, keep the Ben posts coming, I can't get enough Show me where I've said anything that you claimed above. I know it is easier to just jump on the bandwagon, but, try to come with some facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Which of us is being blind in not seeing that he put up over 200 yards in the 1st half of each of his last two games, including 5 TD's and 0 INT's ???? Let me guess, it was the running game and defense (which were both poor) that allowed this to happen. Two games ago was an abberation......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Menudo, what do you think of Michael Vick? Did you see his last game, he was amazing! Do you think Vick is a top 5 QB in the NFL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I've finally come around to your way of thinking about Ben. He is the best QB in the history of professional football. I don't know how I didn't realize it in your first 500 posts extolling his greatness, but something hit me in this 501st one. Mark me down as the newest Ben-Believer. Please, keep the Ben posts coming, I can't get enough +1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 Menudo, what do you think of Michael Vick? Did you see his last game, he was amazing! Do you think Vick is a top 5 QB in the NFL? What has been his QB Rating throughout the years ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) I'll do it for you: Michael Vick - Career QB Rating = 75.5 Ben Roethlisberger - Career QB Rating = 93.5 My argument has never been that Ben is the greatest or amongst them, he's got a long way to go to prove that, but, calling him 'mediocre', or comparing him to Trent Dilfer, after what he has done in the early part of his career is ridiculous. Edited October 25, 2006 by Menudo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Which of us is being blind in not seeing that he put up over 200 yards in the 1st half of each of his last two games, including 5 TD's and 0 INT's ???? Let me guess, it was the running game and defense (which were both poor) that allowed this to happen. vs kc: - parker: 21/109- 2 td's - davenport: 12/78- 1 td - defense allowed only 7 pts (26 yrds to lj) - ben was again effecient: 16/19/238- 2 td's, but again doesn't attempt 20. vs atl: - defense did slow down the most effective rushing team in the nfl, but couldn't cover alge. - pit got no support from their rushing game. - ben looked pretty good, but i am not sure they would have won/lost the game with or without him.... not sure it was all him, or poor pass d from atl - ben: 16/22/238/3 td's - batch: 8/13/195/2 td's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 not sure it was all him, or poor pass d from atl - ben: 16/22/238/3 td's - batch: 8/13/195/2 td's i guess you have your answer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) vs kc: - parker: 21/109- 2 td's - davenport: 12/78- 1 td - defense allowed only 7 pts (26 yrds to lj) - ben was again effecient: 16/19/238- 2 td's, but again doesn't attempt 20. vs atl: - defense did slow down the most effective rushing team in the nfl, but couldn't cover alge. - pit got no support from their rushing game. - ben looked pretty good, but i am not sure they would have won/lost the game with or without him.... not sure it was all him, or poor pass d from atl - ben: 16/22/238/3 td's - batch: 8/13/195/2 td's How about pointing to the fact that he didn't throw in the 2nd half against Kansas City. All but 15 yards were in the 1st half. Imagine what he could have done if he kept throwing. Also, Kansas City's pass defense is ranked 5th in the NFL currently. Atlanta hasn't been terrible against the pass this year. Once again his 238 and 3 TD's came in one half of football. Even with that kind of effort, you are trying to deflect praise away from him. They couldn't run, they played poor defense, and Ben still picked them apart. Paint anyway you want, but, those were the facts from the game. As poorly he played in his first two games, he played on the complete opposite side of the spectrum in the last two, with a near perfect QB Rating. Edited October 25, 2006 by Menudo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 While he's been playing alot more like himself lately, I still think they should play Batch against Oakland. Ben needs to rest. I disagree completely. If he's able to play, let him play. Yes, Batch is a decent backup, but Ben has been playing well. You sit him for a week, then you run the risk of him coming back rusty again. Bad move IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I disagree completely. If he's able to play, let him play. Yes, Batch is a decent backup, but Ben has been playing well. You sit him for a week, then you run the risk of him coming back rusty again. Bad move IMO. riki...out of complete respect for all players, i think he should sit. i am a 9ers fan, and wish young could have prolonged his career a little...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 riki...out of complete respect for all players, i think he should sit. i am a 9ers fan, and wish young could have prolonged his career a little...... You weren't responding to me........... However, I agree with Jaxfactor. Cowher said that they will take every precaution and if a Dr. says he should sit, he will sit. However, if everyone looking at him says he is normal and good to go, he should play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 You weren't responding to me........... However, I agree with Jaxfactor. Cowher said that they will take every precaution and if a Dr. says he should sit, he will sit. However, if everyone looking at him says he is normal and good to go, he should play. my bad. i hope he gets a second opinion from a non-team doc..... if cleared, yes..let him go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 (edited) How about pointing to the fact that he didn't throw in the 2nd half against Kansas City. All but 15 yards were in the 1st half. Imagine what he could have done if he kept throwing. Also, Kansas City's pass defense is ranked 5th in the NFL currently. Atlanta hasn't been terrible against the pass this year. Once again his 238 and 3 TD's came in one half of football. Even with that kind of effort, you are trying to deflect praise away from him. They couldn't run, they played poor defense, and Ben still picked them apart. Paint anyway you want, but, those were the facts from the game. As poorly he played in his first two games, he played on the complete opposite side of the spectrum in the last two, with a near perfect QB Rating. do you still not understand the importance of a lead to the passing strategy? vs kc they could do anythign they wanted. vs. atl, batch virtually matched his performance. if you want to average it out..... 16/26/390/4..... so imo that wasn't about ben..... and i already started the no run support. while the d didn't perform to their norm, they still significantly stagnated atl's strength (#1 running game). seems like you are doing more to glorify his roll than i am "painting it the way i want" Edited October 25, 2006 by Bier Meister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 25, 2006 Author Share Posted October 25, 2006 do you still not understand the importance of a lead to the passing strategy? vs kc they could do anythign they wanted. vs. atl, batch virtually matched his performance. if you want to average it out..... 16/26/390/4..... so imo that wasn't about ben..... and i already started the no run support. while the d didn't perform to their norm, they still significantly stagnated atl's strength (#1 running game). seems like you are doing more to glorify his roll than i am "painting it the way i want" Yes, I understand the importance of passing strategy when playing with the lead. You do realize that his passing was a big reason why they got the lead, right ? You do realize that didn't throw in the 2nd half because of the big lead they had, right ? The guy throws for over 200 yards in the 1st half two games in a row, 5 TD's vs. 0 INT's, has a near-perfect QB Rating, and you are still deflecting credit away from him any way that you can. What can he do to impress you in a game ? Did you watch either game ? For as bad as he looked in the 1st two, he looked great in the last two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.