BodyBagSlam Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I ran down my lineup choices and I am up against one of those spots where my 3 WR/1 RB could be better than a 2 WR/2 RB spread. When you get into those situations, how do you usually decide what to do? Play the matchup or weigh the odds? Also, do you find it riskier overall to do this? Finally, from past experience, do you find it works more oftne than not, or does it tank a lot? I have only done it 3 times in teh past and it worked 2 out of 3 times, but for one time, I had no choice but to play it that way due to a bad bye week. *If anyone was curious, its a Sjax/Wayne/Boldin/Colston vs. Sjax/MJD/Wayne or Boldin/Colston issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I ran down my lineup choices and I am up against one of those spots where my 3 WR/1 RB could be better than a 2 WR/2 RB spread. When you get into those situations, how do you usually decide what to do? Play the matchup or weigh the odds? Also, do you find it riskier overall to do this? Finally, from past experience, do you find it works more oftne than not, or does it tank a lot? I have only done it 3 times in teh past and it worked 2 out of 3 times, but for one time, I had no choice but to play it that way due to a bad bye week. *If anyone was curious, its a Sjax/Wayne/Boldin/Colston vs. Sjax/MJD/Wayne or Boldin/Colston issue. People prefer to have RBs because Rbs are more likely to get touches. WRs grab points in bigger chunks, but RBs get more chances to grab them. After that, you should post a WDIS in the advice forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 when it's a PPR league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 i have to this week ' maybe 1 rb and 4 wr kevin jones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 If I think that my 4th WR will score more points than my 2nd RB, I start the WR. It's not that complicated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 i'm doing it this week sitting Addai for either Booker or Glenn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I always go with the RB over the WR, since they always seem to get more touches. Like last week...I started MBIII (0 pts) & SA (5 pts) over Terry Glenn (15 pts), Burress (11 pts) and Stallworth (9 pts). Knocked out of the playoffs with a 4 pt. loss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 i have to this week ' maybe 1 rb and 4 wr kevin jones at least you have the option Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 That largely depends on who you have as RBs and WRs. In one of my dynasty leagues last year I won the SB running a 1 RB 4 WR set most of the year, including the SB. Of course my WRs were outstanding and my RBs average. In one of my dynasty leagues this year (not the same one) I have run a 1-RB 3-WR 2-TE set for a large part of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.