Randall Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Rookie Class of 2006 produced, and here's why By Pat Kirwan NFL.com Senior Analyst (Jan. 4, 2007) -- There is no doubt that the NFL Rookies of the Year have had outstanding seasons. DeMeco Ryans, the Houston Texans linebacker taken in the second round, had 155 tackles, 3½ sacks, five passes defended, one interception and one forced fumble. He was all over the field and should be a force for years to come. But Ryans is not alone in delivering an excellent rookie season on defense. When it came to sacks, the Bears' Mark Anderson (12) and Browns' Kamerion Wimbley (11) were the top rookies. Packers linebacker A.J. Hawk and Lions linebacker Ernie Sims both had well over 100 tackles, and I could pinpoint about 10 defensive efforts by rookies worthy of high praise from this past season. Marques Colston (No. 12) and Reggie Bush were major parts of the Saints' explosive offense. The Offensive Rookie of the Year, Titans quarterback Vince Young, was as exciting a player as we have seen in years. Fellow rookie quarterbacks Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler and Bruce Gradkowski combined with Young to start 40 games and throw 41 touchdowns to 39 interceptions. The 2006 rookie QB production puts the great Class of 1983 rookie production to shame. As for yardage producers, rookies Maurice Jones-Drew, Reggie Bush, Leon Washington, Santonio Holmes, Joseph Addai, Laurence Maroney, Devin Hester, Marques Colston and Jerious Norwood all generated over 1,000 yards of offense and returns. All this production begs the question: Why have so many rookies made big impacts? In my opinion, it is a combination of factors that have made so many rookies play well in their first year: 1. Colleges are playing a version of football that is much closer to pro football than ever before. It wasn't too long ago that option principles were a big part of the college game. If you consider all the practice time that was dedicated to running the option and defending it, which took away from the passing game and the pro running game, it's easy to see that players just didn't get the work they do today on aspects that relate to the pro game. 2. The salary cap and the escalation of rookie salaries have forced rookies on the field sooner. With the readiness up because of the style of play many of them are coming from in school, they respond with good techniques. 3. NFL coaches are more open to playing rookies than ever before and that trend will continue for years to come. When coaches around the league see the Saints sitting in the NFC's No. 2 playoff seed while getting close to 2,600 yards with 17 touchdowns out of Bush and Colston and starting rookies on the offensive line, we will see more of it in 2007. 4. The rookies are bigger, stronger and faster when they show up. The effects of serious strength and speed training programs down at the high school level puts more freshmen on the field in the college game, and there is no doubt rookies are coming to the NFL with the physical tools to compete right away. It wasn't too long ago the NFL strength and conditioning coaches felt they needed two years to get a player ready for the physical demands of the pro game. Jones-Drew, Nick Mangold and Marcus McNeill were ready from Day 1 to use power to win. 5. Situation substitution, which drives the NFL, has helped some rookies play to their strengths while developing the other skills required. A good example is in Chicago where Anderson grabbed 12 sacks as a situational pass rusher. With all this talk about great rookies, there's no mention of the first overall pick, Mario Williams. It's unfortunate he seems left out because his 4½ sacks, 47 tackles and three passes defended appear pedestrian compared to other rookie performances. First, let me point out that the great Michael Strahan had one sack his rookie season and followed that up with 4½ his second season. Mario Williams faces unfair comparisons but still has a bright future. Second, the Texans struggled this season as a team and opponents often had early leads and ran the ball, more providing fewer opportunities to sack the QB. For example, the Bears had close to 80 more pass attempts against them than the Texans had this season. Many times the Bears defense was in a pass situation, while a team like the Texans was defending the run. Third, Williams would really benefit from an outstanding rusher on the opposite side. For example, when Julius Peppers was a rookie he had 12 sacks, but over on the opposite side, Mike Rucker had 10 sacks and that meant Peppers had some single block situations. Fourth, Williams will forever be compared to Bush and Young because the Texans passed on both to take the defensive end. Bush and Young will always have flashier stats than Williams, who will probably be viewed as a guy with the question, "What happened to the No. 1 pick?" Now that the rookie Class of 2006 has one season down, what would the first 20 picks look like in a redraft with no teams considered? Here's a list based on the opinion of two personnel people along with my opinion. 1. Vince Young 2. Matt Leinart 3. Jay Cutler 4. DeMeco Ryans 5. Reggie Bush 6. Maurice Jones-Drew 7. Mark Anderson 8. Marques Colston 9. A.J. Hawk 10. Devin Hester 11. Kamerion Wimbley 12. Mario Williams 13. Nick Mangold 14. D'Brickashaw Ferguson 15. Santonio Holmes 16. Laurence Maroney 17. Joseph Addai 18. Marcus McNeill 19. Johnathan Joseph 20. Dawan Landry It is interesting that seven of these 20 were not even first-round selections last spring. But like the saying goes, "The reason a rearview mirror is smaller than a windshield is because we should look forward more than we look back." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 or it could just be a fluke year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I was actually going to do this one of these days, give props to the 2006 draft class for being about as fine a rookie class as I can think of. Though I think his "reasons" are slightly misguided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted January 4, 2007 Author Share Posted January 4, 2007 I was actually going to do this one of these days, give props to the 2006 draft class for being about as fine a rookie class as I can think of. Though I think his "reasons" are slightly misguided. Yes some are, but it was an amazing class of rookies. When he said that list was re-draft was he talking fantasy? I never saw him do that before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 I'm really glad that at the beginning of the season I decided to buy a whole bunch of Topps football cards to start a collection for my son. When he's old enough to appreciate them, he'll find some great rookie cards in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 Yes some are, but it was an amazing class of rookies. When he said that list was re-draft was he talking fantasy? I never saw him do that before. I don't think so. I think what he meant by it, was not taking into consideration any teams needs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Irish Doggy Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 I hate to think what the Bengals would have looked like this year without 1st round CB Joseph, 2nd round OT Whitworth, and 4th rounder DT Peko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjpro11 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 (edited) it was a solid year.. but hester at #10? c'mon now.. i'd think wimbley would be top 10 over him. btw.. you can go ahead and add anthony smith, FS, Steelers to the list of solid rookies. a 3rd round pick who has come in and made an immediate impact. he hits like a semi truck and is a ball hawk. poor houshmandzadeh Edited January 5, 2007 by jjpro11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted January 5, 2007 Author Share Posted January 5, 2007 it was a solid year.. but hester at #10? c'mon now.. i'd think wimbley would be top 10 over him. btw.. you can go ahead and add anthony smith, FS, Steelers to the list of solid rookies. a 3rd round pick who has come in and made an immediate impact. he hits like a semi truck and is a ball hawk. poor houshmandzadeh I would have included Bethea too. He had a good year until he was hurt. Greg Jennings did too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.