polksalet Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Earlier in the season he made the remark that he was afraid not keeping Vandy would be detrimental. Well it turns out he was dead on. If Vandy were back there instead ot the tiny dancer he would have made a better block. It might have been an accidental block but because he is so much bigger than tiny dancer he would have gotten in the way and the cowboys would have won. Thank you TO!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Earlier in the season he made the remark that he was afraid not keeping Vandy would be detrimental. Well it turns out he was dead on. If Vandy were back there instead ot the tiny dancer he would have made a better block. It might have been an accidental block but because he is so much bigger than tiny dancer he would have gotten in the way and the cowboys would have won. Thank you TO!!!!! i think you may be reaching just a bit ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongheaded Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Earlier in the season he made the remark that he was afraid not keeping Vandy would be detrimental. Well it turns out he was dead on. If Vandy were back there instead ot the tiny dancer he would have made a better block. It might have been an accidental block but because he is so much bigger than tiny dancer he would have gotten in the way and the cowboys would have won. Thank you TO!!!!! i agree, TO is usually right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllThingsBillBelichick Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Give T.O. a hug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peepinmofo Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Maybe his new book will be "Little T teaches proper blocking". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecerwin Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 I loved his fantasy points this year but he was a constant headache. When I read about him criticizing the team for dropping Vandy I was pretty annoyed but couldn't complain because he was putting up good numbers for me. While you might be reaching a bit you also bring up an interesting point... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Please, Vandy misses the 50 yarder, shanks the other one and we lose anyway. Romo's botch never happens and we aren't talking about this at all. TO is wrong again............... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Vanderwho? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGrunt Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Earlier in the season he made the remark that he was afraid not keeping Vandy would be detrimental. Well it turns out he was dead on. If Vandy were back there instead ot the tiny dancer he would have made a better block. It might have been an accidental block but because he is so much bigger than tiny dancer he would have gotten in the way and the cowboys would have won. Thank you TO!!!!! Please, Vandy misses the 50 yarder, shanks the other one and we lose anyway. Romo's botch never happens and we aren't talking about this at all. TO is wrong again............... Wow... This is some deep mourning going on here. I've seen you both go from the denial stage, to the anger stage, and now it looks like your in a mix of denial, depression and negotiation. However, not so much the negotiation. Go Seahawks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.