Randall Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 LINK Willis to Buffalo Lynch to GB I don't agree with Jarrett to the Vikings, but maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 Any mock draft that has my Lions taking Brady Quinn makes me go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 6 DE Jamaal Anderson Arkansas Jr. 6-6 280 The Redskins have to be disappointed to see Alan Branch off the board. Branch would’ve provided the ‘Skins with a great interior rush, but with two great pass rushers available, Washington turns their attention to Anderson and Adams. ______________________________________________ 8 DT Alan Branch Michigan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 opps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I like the Pats picks in this mock. LB and DB. That's what I want to see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I don't agree with Jarrett to the Vikings, but maybe. I like Jarrett over Ginn though. The Vikings already have a small but fast wussy WR in Williamson... they don't need another one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryTheRock Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 First one I seen with the Saints going DT in the first. Most are CB with a LB sprinkled in here and there. all three are needs though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I like the Pats picks in this mock. LB and DB. That's what I want to see! I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted February 9, 2007 Author Share Posted February 9, 2007 First one I seen with the Saints going DT in the first. Most are CB with a LB sprinkled in here and there. all three are needs though. I line their line a lot better than their LB'ers although Danny Clark could fit in somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryTheRock Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I line their line a lot better than their LB'ers although Danny Clark could fit in somewhere. What's up with Clark anyway? He was supposed to have a decent season in Oakland last year and then got cut...couldn't beat out Siminoueoueoue(however you spell it). I don't know if he is even going to be resigned this year. I tihnk they should finally take that step and get a sud LB if one falls. Cb and DT are a need as well. If they go one of those at least I will be happy. If Haslett were still around I would be worried that they would go RB in the first round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryTheRock Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I line their line a lot better than their LB'ers although Danny Clark could fit in somewhere. So I just went and looked through a bunch o Mock Drafts and these are some various names brought up for the Saints... Lawrence Timmons, OLB, Florida State Daymeion Hughes, CB, Cal PAUL POSLUSZNY OLB Penn St. Zach Miller TE Arizona State DT, DeMarcus Tyler, N.C. State Patrick Willis, LB Ole Miss H.B. Blades, LB, Pittsburgh Brandon Siler, LB, Florida *DARRELLE REVIS, CB (Pittsburgh) I don't know alot about many of these guys. That's why the proposed Fantasy U for rookies would be helpful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Irish Doggy Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 See, if it was the Viking they were predicting, that would make sense as Minny just sits back and waits a few more turns before actually picking. So 6 becomes 9. 69... oh yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puddy Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 Hi Puddy: Thanks for the email... It has been changed. It was a technical problem, but it has been corrected. Thanks, Chris Steuber ----- Original Message ----- From: Puddy To: csteuber@nfldraftpro.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 11:49 AM Subject: Mock Draft You may want to change your description on the Redskins pick at #6. You state that they are upset Alan Branch is off the board but you have Branch going 2 spots later. Puddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.