darin3 Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) Week 1- 9/9 at San Diego 2 - 9/16 KANSAS CITY 3 - 9/23 DALLAS 4 - 9/30 at Detroit 5 - 10/7 at Green Bay 6 - 10/14 MINNESOTA 7 - 10/21 at Philadelphia 8 - 10/28 DETROIT 9 - 11/4 BYE 10 - 11/11 at Oakland 11 - 11/18 at Seattle 12 - 11/25 DENVER 13 - 12/2 N.Y. GIANTS 14 - 12/6 at Washington 15 - 12/17 at Minnesota 16 - 12/23 GREEN BAY 17 - 12-30 NEW ORLEANS CAPS = home game Edited April 12, 2007 by darin3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 Week 1- 9/9 at San Diego 2 - 9/16 KANSAS CITY 3 - 9/23 DALLAS 4 - 9/30 at Detroit 5 - 10/7 at Green Bay 6 - 10/14 MINNESOTA 7 - 10/21 at Philadelphia 8 - 10/28 DETROIT 9 - 11/4 BYE 10 - 11/11 at Oakland 11 - 11/18 at Seattle 12 - 11/25 DENVER 13 - 12/2 N.Y. GIANTS 14 - 12/6 at Washington 15 - 12/17 at Minnesota 16 - 12/23 GREEN BAY 17 - 12-30 NEW ORLEANS CAPS = home game If they remain healthy, there's no reason why the Bears do not end up at least 12-4 with that schedule. I have not done the EOS yet of course but CHI has to have a great schedule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 14-2 and thats with a healthy mcnabb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 If they remain healthy and get the passing game together, there's no reason why the Bears do not end up at least 12-4 with that schedule. Added to for completeness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 If they remain healthy and get the passing game together, and rediscover a running attack, there's no reason why the Bears do not end up at least 12-4 with that schedule. I have not done the EOS yet of course but CHI has to have a great schedule. Added to for completeness one more time. But I see 11-5, including at least one div. loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 How many games does Grossman start this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitem0nkey Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) I just per ESPN we have the 2nd easiest schedule for 2007 Opp. Win Pct. .465 While the Bills and raiders have the hardest at .539 followed by that patriots and the titans. Edited April 12, 2007 by whitem0nkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 Added to for completeness one more time. But I see 11-5, including at least one div. loss. I concur with 11-5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 12-3 with the @Sea game being a coin flip. 5-1 in the North - they flat-out have more talent than the other 3 teams in the division, and I think only GB at Lambeau has a shot at taking them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 It will be interesting if that Saints game at the end of the season will have any meaning or not....can't wait to get my tickets for this season! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 I concur with 11-5 And if Benson lays an egg and we don't beef up the run (Adrian is still an unknown) ........8-8! 12-3 with the @Sea game being a coin flip. 5-1 in the North - they flat-out have more talent than the other 3 teams in the division, and I think only GB at Lambeau has a shot at taking them. Agree, and Da Bolts for an opener will be tough! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 It will be interesting if that Saints game at the end of the season will have any meaning or not....can't wait to get my tickets for this season! After the conditions of the game in the playoffs last year I was kind of hoping the NFL would put that game earlier in the season before the weather got awful..... So much for that.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 11-5 seems right. They could easily find themselves 2-3 after week 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 I just per ESPN we have the 2nd easiest schedule for 2007 Opp. Win Pct. .465 While the Bills and raiders have the hardest at .539 followed by that patriots and the titans. I heard their opponents were well over .500??????? Didn't do the math myself yet but I'm thinking more like 10-6. No Tank, no Briggs, Benson a ? still. Let's hope Benson is worth the time and $ since I have been sitting on him for two years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 16-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.