Bronco Billy Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Holy crap. How long before the "I'm rubber & you're glue. What you say bounces off of me & sticks to you." card is played? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 so let me see if i've got this correctly....the dallas cowboys want mcnabb to stay in philly, even though he's drubbed them like a rented mule throughout his career, because the cowboys were better than the eagles in the 70s? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 so let me see if i've got this correctly....the dallas cowboys want mcnabb to stay in philly, even though he's drubbed them like a rented mule throughout his career, because the cowboys were better than the eagles in the 70s? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Holy crap. How long before the "I'm rubber & you're glue. What you say bounces off of me & sticks to you." card is played? I'm rubber, you're glue......times infinity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 so let me see if i've got this correctly....the dallas cowboys want mcnabb to stay in philly, even though he's drubbed them like a rented mule throughout his career, because the cowboys were better than the eagles in the 70s? No, because he's not the QB he was even a few years ago and definitely not as good as Garcia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 No, because he's not the QB he was even a few years ago and definitely not as good as Garcia. wow, just when it seemed like your comments in this thread couldn't get any dumber, you kick it up a couple notches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 No, because he's not the QB he was even a few years ago and definitely not as good as Garcia. just when I thought ......umm I think az covered this.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted May 10, 2007 Author Share Posted May 10, 2007 What an exaggeration of a title for this thread!! The whole story is a media circus attempt to give McNabb print time... Eagles have not said a word about McNabb not being there.....where in the story does it say/quote the title of the thread? Drafting a QB doesn't mean anything...get your thread title right: McNabb expounds on Eagles Drafting QB is a better title....every player is on the way out--they get closer to being gone every day....! It's called sensationalizing a thread topic. I'm not the first and won't be the last to do it here at the Huddle... And I will add, there is a question mark. So I just pose the question as a topic for discussion and not stating this as fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 LMAO whata joke. I heard he's on his way out of Philly (he's going on vacation). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fitzkek Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 wow, just when it seemed like your comments in this thread couldn't get any dumber, you kick it up a couple notches. Wow. Couldn't agree w/you more. WADA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericthemidget Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Don't be surprised if the speculation on them parting ways heats up this year. Interesting interview on local Philly radio this past week. Link at http://www.fantasymojo.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muchofawhere Posted May 13, 2007 Share Posted May 13, 2007 No, because he's not the QB he was even a few years ago and definitely not as good as Garcia. Not as good as Garcia? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Garcia (6 Games) TD’s – 10 (1.66 per game) Int. – 2 (.33 per game) Rating – 95.8 Record - 5-1 (Only loss to Indy) McNabb (10 Games) TD’s – 18 (1.8 per game) Int’s – 6 (.6 per game) Rating – 95.5 Record – 5-5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Next Generation Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Garcia (6 Games) TD’s – 10 (1.66 per game) Int. – 2 (.33 per game) Rating – 95.8 Record - 5-1 (Only loss to Indy) McNabb (10 Games) TD’s – 18 (1.8 per game) Int’s – 6 (.6 per game) Rating – 95.5 Record – 5-5 You forgot a stat: 6.96 yds/att (Garcia) / 8.38 yds/att (McNabb) I really didn't think Cowboys fans were this obtuse. But, I'll cut you some slack since you're obviously not too bright (as evidenced by always resorting to the championships when trying to discuss football in 2007, but I digress). You see, the coaches expect McNabb to MAKE PLAYS because he is such a dynamic athlete and QB. So, they give him a very complex set of plays to run which enable them to strtech the field and be a big-play offense. When Garcia bacame the starter, it was obvious that he couldn't run the same set of complex plays due to his more limited skill-set. So, they changed the offensive philosophy to be a more ball-controlled offense enabling them to eat-up more clock and utilize the short passing game. Thus, a more ball-controlled offense led to a more rested defense so the defense was able to step-up it's game. End result was Garcia had better stats because he was asked to do easier, less risky things as a QB than McNabb was. School's out, you are dismissed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 LOL ... Maybe McFagg would have a better that .500 record if the coaches made it easier on him as well. I heard somewhere that he wasn't that smart anyway. 5-1 > 5-5 Maybe in the slum schools of Philly .500 is greater than .833! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 ahaha when did KS2000 turn into a troll? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 also...when you look at the numbers and are a stat-geek...you will say that Garcia is better because of the wins... but you don't mention the fact that the gameplan was altered completely to a more balanced offense... does this make Garcia better?...no...I mean, he's better than Romo... but all Romo had was a coach who called plays around his weaknesses...which was exposed after about 6 or 7 weeks.... Romo and Garcia had coaches who managed the game around their flaws....so I will compare the two in this scenario because McNabb is a better QB than both of these 2 combined... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Well I will give you this .... Romo and Garcia do have something in common with all Eagle QB's in history ... zero SB victories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Well I will give you this .... Romo and Garcia do have something in common with all Eagle QB's in history ... zero SB victories. and they'll continue to do so for the duration of their careers... until we win one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Next Generation Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 LOL ... Maybe McFagg would have a better that .500 record if the coaches made it easier on him as well. I heard somewhere that he wasn't that smart anyway. 5-1 > 5-5 Maybe in the slum schools of Philly .500 is greater than .833! There you go again changing argument to deflect. Garcia's RECORD was better than McNabb's LAST YEAR. Sure, no arguments there. But...now try to stay on-topic here...that does NOT = Garcia better than McNabb no matter how much you try to insult the fine educational system of the great city of Philadelphia. So, according to you the reason that the Cowboys would love for McNabb to stick around is because he has declined as a QB over the years, so much so that the 37-year-old Garcia is better. THAT's your reasoning? Awesome. We'll keep him, his diminishing skills, his 9-3 record against the Cowboys (including a 14 pt win last year) and the same coaching staff around at least for the next couple of years and see how that works-out for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 History says it will work out fine for Dallas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Next Generation Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 History says it will work out fine for Dallas. No, it doesn't. History says that the Eagles facing Dallas with McNabb as QB = not good for Dallas. But you keep spinning it any way you want to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kansas State 2000 Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 An honest Eagle Fan! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 An honest Eagle Fan! I don't need to ask him How he's a moron, as I already know...cause he's an Eagle fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Next Generation Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 I don't need to ask him How he's a moron, as I already know...cause he's an Eagle fan. The fact that you needed to spell that out in reply to KS2s post speaks volumes about the intelligence, or lack thereof, of Cowboy fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.