rajncajn Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 8 Colston, Marques NOS WR 34.2 High. He's obviously a very good football player, but I question his injury history. I don't draft him as the #8 WR, maybe around #16 or so. He has an injury history? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 He has an injury history? I think he was saying that we don't know if Colston can be durable throughout an entire season... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I think he was saying that we don't know if Colston can be durable throughout an entire season... And I'm just asking what he's basing that on. He missed 3 weeks with a high ankle sprain last year, that's hardly reason to consider him an injury risk IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Not ONE Viking on that list? I gotta think one of them is at least the 50th ranked WR. I hope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Love Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 18 Johnson, Calvin DET WR 57.9 Low. Mike Furrey was the #12 WR last season in PPR. Furrey also had more fantasy points than Roy 9 of 16 weeks. CJ2 is a much more intriguing player than Furrey. I don't know. I'm pretty sure that I won't end up with Johnson on any of my redraft teams this year. Roy is still the #1 here, but despite the perceived talent disparity, I think CJ and Furrey will end up being 2A and 2B, as Furrey will continue to get the underneath/over the middle looks that he thrived on last year. CJ will probably be very streaky in 2007, having good games when teams double Roy, having mediocre-to-poor games when they don't. At #18 WR you need an every week starter. I don't think CJ is going to have that kind of year for the Lions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Not ONE Viking on that list? I gotta think one of them is at least the 50th ranked WR. I hope. You would think so, but its average draft position on MFL - not rankings. Williamson or Rice might break the top 50 as we get closer to the season. Right now nobody knows for sure who is the #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystykoekaki Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I'm sorry but no way would I pick Lee Evans ahead of TJ Housh....just to name one name. Makes no sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Which guys below #25 have a good chance of stepping into the top 15? 33 Jennings, Greg GBP WR 101.14 36 Hackett, D.J. SEA WR 118.33 40 Bowe, Dwayne KCC WR 135.02 45 Henderson, Devery NOS WR 139.51 Way too low imo. So is Driver at #17. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 And I'm just asking what he's basing that on. He missed 3 weeks with a high ankle sprain last year, that's hardly reason to consider him an injury risk IMHO. How about the entire 2004 season at Hofstra with a bum shoulder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_bone65 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 (edited) I think Mark Clayton at #27 shoud be higher, going into his 3rd season and he had a very good year last year as well. Edited June 13, 2007 by T_bone65 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 How about the entire 2004 season at Hofstra with a bum shoulder? Honestly I can see owners shying away from him due to the lack of experience, but combining an injury in 2004 with a 3-game hiatus in 2006 for a high ankle sprain still hardly warrants labeling him as an injury risk. I'll admit picking him 8th is quite a risk, but if you project his numbers over a full season last year that puts him just behind Harrison. I think that's a risk a lot of owners would jump to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Honestly I can see owners shying away from him due to the lack of experience, but combining an injury in 2004 with a 3-game hiatus in 2006 for a high ankle sprain still hardly warrants labeling him as an injury risk. Hardly? What else do you need to say he's had past injury problems besides pointing out that he's missed 35% of his football games over a three year period? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Hardly? What else do you need to say he's had past injury problems besides pointing out that he's missed 35% of his football games over a three year period? 2 injuries throughout his entire college & pro career. One a major one 4 years removed and the other a very minor ankle sprain which held him out 3 games. Ok, whatever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 2 injuries throughout his entire college & pro career. One a major one 4 years removed and the other a very minor ankle sprain which held him out 3 games. Ok, whatever... So he's not an injury risk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 So he's not an injury risk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.