Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Michael Vick's career


Crazysight
 Share

Michael Vick's career  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. What is going to be the end result of all of this?

    • Vick gets off scott-free and continues on as "the most exciting player in the NFL"
      5
    • Suspension of less than a year
      5
    • Suspended for a year
      5
    • Short prison term ala Ray Lewis, plus possible suspension
      26
    • By the time he gets out, career will be over
      26


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'll go with "b".

 

I'm sure he doesn't want to go to trial and have any more damaging evidence made public. Certainly, the NFL and the Falcons don't want him going to trial. He'll cop a plea to a lesser charge, do no prison time, pay a fine, probation, community service, do some charity work for some animal rights group, claim he's a changed man and be done with it. I'll say he gets a four to eight game suspension by the NFL depending on exactly what he admits to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go with "b".

 

I'm sure he doesn't want to go to trial and have any more damaging evidence made public. Certainly, the NFL and the Falcons don't want him going to trial. He'll cop a plea to a lesser charge, do no prison time, pay a fine, probation, community service, do some charity work for some animal rights group, claim he's a changed man and be done with it. I'll say he gets a four to eight game suspension by the NFL depending on exactly what he admits to.

Sounds about right. But he definetely holds the right to let it play out which he should if he had nothing to do with it. The suspicion will definetely be there if a plea bargains. The only way to "erase" this and prove his innocence is to let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds about right. But he definetely holds the right to let it play out which he should if he had nothing to do with it. The suspicion will definetely be there if a plea bargains. The only way to "erase" this and prove his innocence is to let it play out.

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D

 

 

It's not that funny. He might be innocent.

 

C'mon, who among us hasn't had an illegal dog fighting ring run on our property without our knowledge or consent? I'm sure it happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that funny. He might be innocent.

 

C'mon, who among us hasn't had an illegal dog fighting ring run on our property without our knowledge or consent? I'm sure it happens all the time.

For all I know my brother is selling drugs out of the shed in the backyard. I never go back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all I know my brother is selling drugs out of the shed in the backyard. I never go back there.

If he was, your parents would be responsible because they own the shed where its taking place

 

Ignorance is not a defense

Edited by Zooty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he was, your parents would be responsible because they own the shed where its taking place

 

Ignorance is not a defense

Touche. But what if my parents live in California and just my brother and I lived there. And my parents bought the shed because we needed somewhere to house lawn equipment? And they never checked up on the place. Are they still guilty?

 

What the heck am I typing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Touche. But what if my parents live in California and just my brother and I lived there. And my parents bought the shed because we needed somewhere to house lawn equipment? And they never checked up on the place. Are they still guilty?

 

What the heck am I typing?

Yes, the owner is responsible

 

A coherent rebuttal, congrats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the owner is responsible

 

A coherent rebuttal, congrats

But isn't that similar to the relationship that a owner of a house that rents it to another person? And in that case the owner of the house would not be found responsible unless said owner was a repeat offender of such situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information