keggerz Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 (edited) Joe Levit quote "... A top fantasy wide receiver needs to consistently put points in your pocket, and Smith has done that well in only one season..." I guess you are referring about his 2005 season as the "only one season." and if so those receiving numbers were: 103/1563/12 Excluding 2004 due to the broken bone in his 1st game! This is how his last 52(*includes the 2 games he was out last yr) games shape up Year.........Games.........Catches........Yards.........TDs. 2003..........12.................79............979............6 03Playoffs...4.................18.............404...........3 2005..........16................103..........1563..........12 05Playoffs....4.................36............466............5 2006..........16*.................83...........1166...........8 Totals.........52...............319..........4578..........34 AVERAGES: 16................98...........1408..........10.5 so his avg the last 52 games is 98/1408/11 and his "only one time" season is 103/1563/12 even if you remove that year his averages are: 96/1340/10 seems like more then just one season to me. if you want to include all 16 games from 2003 then you have the following totals: 332/4709/35 or an avg of 95/1345/10 and if you back out his "only one time" season the averages would still be 92/1258/9(including 4 games before he truly broke out back in 2003) Edited August 10, 2007 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulOttCarruth Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 (edited) I suspect that when he says consistency he's referring to game-to-game consistency vs. year-to-year (though I won't speak for him). Smith relies on the big play, perhaps moreso than other top fantasy wideouts. If he doesn't have a big play, he tends to have a bad week. I disagree with the notion that he can't be a top 3 WR because I'll take a guy who is inconsistently great than over one who is consistently average. It's the Rudi Johnson argument all over again. Edited August 10, 2007 by PaulOttCarruth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted August 10, 2007 Author Share Posted August 10, 2007 I suspect that when he says consistency he's referring to game-to-game consistency vs. year-to-year (though I won't speak for him). Smith relies on the big play, perhaps moreso than other top fantasy wideouts. If he doesn't have a big play, he tends to have a bad week. I disagree with the notion that he can't be a top 3 WR because I'll take a guy who is inconsistently great than over one who is consistently average. It's the Rudi Johnson argument all over again. i can pull the numbers by week if need be(just havent had the time to do so yet) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulOttCarruth Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 i can pull the numbers by week if need be(just havent had the time to do so yet) No need to. DMD already did the legwork in his consistency ranking of WRs. http://www.thehuddle.com/x7/articles/dmd-con-wr.php Smith ranks at the top so I guess my perception that he has a lot of monster games and quite a few stinkers was incorrect. That makes me even more confident that he can be a top 3 WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tally Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 look how low CJ is on that chart, not only is he below Housh but he's also below chris henry.....interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.