GameOn! Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 If you saw .. you know it ! Thats horrific officiating ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Didn't see it. Glad I didn't see it. I would be throwing things at or around the television's vicinity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 What a horseSega! call. CHI jumps offsides, no call, and the exchange is fumbled at the Bears 1/2 yard line. You can't challenge that or what? (Didn't have the sound on the TV..) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 seemed to clearly be in the neutral zone. that was just a missed call. i do give it up to chicago for timing that jump so well. it happened so fast i don't think the official had time to react. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystykoekaki Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I LOVE THIS....I GOT CHICAGO DEFENSE!....W00T! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabuffbills Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 It was very close, but it looked like he was offsides by a few inches Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameOn! Posted September 9, 2007 Author Share Posted September 9, 2007 Bad enough LT's not doing well, but don't take the game away from them. Nuteral zone infractions should be reviewable ..... what a joke ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I LOVE THIS....I GOT CHICAGO DEFENSE!....W00T! So do I, but I've also got LT... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 he was offsides, but just barely. i think rivers needs to vary his cadence somehow, 'cause tommie harris is killing them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 People who favor instant replay always say they favor it so that the right call can be made. I have NEVER favored instant replay ... even more so now when such an obvious missed call is not reviewable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Nuteral zone infractions should be reviewable they probably will be soon, and that will be the tape that they play for the rules committee to make it happen. the refs got that call wrong (though it was close).....but, man....how can you not love the bears defense? those boys make some f'n plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 People who favor instant replay always say they favor it so that the right call can be made. I have NEVER favored instant replay ... even more so now when such an obvious missed call is not reviewable. that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameOn! Posted September 9, 2007 Author Share Posted September 9, 2007 Props to the Beard D .. no doubt .. but missed calls like that can change the outcome of the game. A little different than missing an offsides when its 4 & 15 on your own 20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystykoekaki Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 sh!t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. What don't you understand People say they favor instant replay so that the right call can be made, but not every play is reviewable ... so the intent of instant replay is NOT to get every call right ... only some of them. I have never favored instant replay. Even more so when a very obvious missed call can not be reversed with instant replay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 What don't you understand People say they favor instant replay so that the right call can be made, but not every play is reviewable ... so the intent of instant replay is NOT to get every call right ... only some of them. I have never favored instant replay. Even more so when a very obvious missed call can not be reversed with instant replay. so if every play was reviewable, then you would be in favor of it? strange to say you aren't in favor of something at all because it is only used selectively ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebartender Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I LOVE THIS....I GOT CHICAGO DEFENSE!....W00T! +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 they just fell for the fake-sweep-LT-pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 they just fell for the fake-sweep-LT-pass LOVE IT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 so if every play was reviewable, then you would be in favor of it? strange to say you aren't in favor of something at all because it is only used selectively ... No I do not favor instant replay, period. My point was is that proponents of instant replay say they favor it because it is all about getting it right. But that is not really the truth because it is only about getting SOME of the calls right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 No I do not favor instant replay, period. My point was is that proponents of instant replay say they favor it because it is all about getting it right. But that is not really the truth because it is only about getting SOME of the calls right. so you're in favor of them getting more calls wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 No I do not favor instant replay, period. My point was is that proponents of instant replay say they favor it because it is all about getting it right. But that is not really the truth because it is only about getting SOME of the calls right. Some is better than none, plain and simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameOn! Posted September 9, 2007 Author Share Posted September 9, 2007 No I do not favor instant replay, period. My point was is that proponents of instant replay say they favor it because it is all about getting it right. But that is not really the truth because it is only about getting SOME of the calls right. That sounds fair ,.... just get SOME of the calls right ....... just do your best refs ........ don't worry about it ...... C'mon now ...... let's get serious here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 so you're in favor of them getting more calls wrong? No I think every single play should be reviewed by a committee of 5 appointed by the commissioner so that we can be sure that every call is right. Calls by the ref are simply another component of the game. You don't lose or win because of an ref's call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Oh yeah, this thread is going good places. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.