devildog0311 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Been holding onto this guy for a while. Just wandering how he'll do behind GB's line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbrake Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 About 70 yrds and a TD sounds about right.Start him a good 2 or 3 this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suburban_pimp Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Minnesota D? AVOID Him. If I had to guess: 35 - 40 Yards Rushing 3 Receptions 15 - 30 Yards Receiving NO TDs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timnmakayla Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Yeah, MIN D is allowing a mere 67.3yds/game and haven't allowed a rushing TD this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devildog0311 Posted September 30, 2007 Author Share Posted September 30, 2007 Sorry guys I was thinking more for the rest of the season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rileyrott Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Sorry guys I was thinking more for the rest of the season Yeah, me too. I would wait a while to see what he does, but, like you, I've held onto him waiting..........hopefully, a good bye week replacement and good bench back-up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delicious_bass Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Sorry guys I was thinking more for the rest of the season Rest of season...I would say he'd be a decent fill in on bye weeks maybe. I dont know that you'll get enough out of him to warrant weekly starter status as there are several backs currently in the mix and GB's O is more heavily weighted toward the pass anyways. That said, if he impresses now that he's more healthy, that might unclutter the backfield and give them an opportunity to run more of a balanced offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 (edited) Sorry guys I was thinking more for the rest of the season Any starting RB has value, imo. The Pack usually goes more to the rushing game when it gets colder. Just to add that it remains to be seen how long he will be called the starting RB for Green Bay. Edited September 30, 2007 by MikesVikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 About 70 yrds and a TD sounds about right.Start him a good 2 or 3 this week. It does? That sounds pretty wacky to me for someone not very talented with no experience this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 It does? That sounds pretty wacky to me for someone not very talented with no experience this season. and going against a tough Minny run D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Rest of season...I would say he'd be a decent fill in on bye weeks maybe. I dont know that you'll get enough out of him to warrant weekly starter status as there are several backs currently in the mix and GB's O is more heavily weighted toward the pass anyways. That said, if he impresses now that he's more healthy, that might unclutter the backfield and give them an opportunity to run more of a balanced offense. Several backs in the GB system is what would concern me as well at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.