Randall Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 But it ain't the Packers. Congrats to the Cardinals. Nice win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 The Pack are the worst 4-0 team in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Well Childress is doing his part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystykoekaki Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 The Pack are the worst 4-0 team in the league. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 But it ain't the Packers. Congrats to the Cardinals. Nice win. Suck it......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Well Childress is doing his part. I was of dropping a line to Zygi and saying how much I appreciate his foresight in not letting Childress visit GB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockerbraves Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 The Pack are the worst 4-0 team in the league. Even the oddsmakers agree. Arn't the packers 4-0 against the spread too? I hopped aboard today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted October 1, 2007 Author Share Posted October 1, 2007 The Pack are the worst 4-0 team in the league. Of course they aren't on par with Indy, The Pats, and the Cowboys. I never said they were. They have a lot of work to do fixing their running game and the rest of their team. The defense, and starting 4-0 gives them time to work on it. It's just a nice start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadgerBacker Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Of course they aren't on par with Indy, The Pats, and the Cowboys. I never said they were. They have a lot of work to do fixing their running game and the rest of their team. The defense, and starting 4-0 gives them time to work on it. It's just a nice start. +1 Great start, but they have work to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulOttCarruth Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) Of course they aren't on par with Indy, The Pats, and the Cowboys. I never said they were. They have a lot of work to do fixing their running game and the rest of their team. The defense, and starting 4-0 gives them time to work on it. It's just a nice start. I agree they're not on par with Indy or the Pats. As for the Cowboys, I'm not ready to crown their ass. Who have they beat? It's not hard to put up 30-40 on the Rams, Dolphins and Giants. And the Bears are proving they suck. Dallas' defense has looked good, but again, they shut down some horrible offenses. Edited October 1, 2007 by PaulOttCarruth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Of course they aren't on par with Indy, The Pats, and the Cowboys. I never said they were. I wasn't poking at you; I am just going on the record that I am thrilled for GB to be the worst "whatever-and-oh" team in the league. They have a good shot at being the league's worst 6-0 team going into their bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I agree they're not on par with Indy or the Pats. As for the Cowboys, I'm not ready to crown their ass. Who have they beat? It's not hard to put up 30-40 on the Rams, Dolphins and Giants. And the Bears are proving they suck. Dallas' defense has looked good, but again, they shut down some horrible offenses. I would have to agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I agree they're not on par with Indy or the Pats. As for the Cowboys, I'm not ready to crown their ass. Who have they beat? It's not hard to put up 30-40 on the Rams, Dolphins and Giants. And the Bears are proving they suck. Dallas' defense has looked good, but again, they shut down some horrible offenses. Oh yeah?! Well... Meh. No arguments from me on your points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 You guys are threatening to give Cowboy fans a good name here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.