heehawks Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 (edited) Ok, I know, Chicago has not been playing very good defense lately, epecially fantasy scoring defense. But geez, they play the lowly Raiders. Common sense says they have got to put up some decent fantasy points this week against one of the worst offensive teams in the league. I would think a couple picks and three or four sacks. So why the complete absence in the Team Defense Report? Edited November 8, 2007 by heehawks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marauders11 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Ok, I know, Chicago has not been playing very good defense lately, epecially fantasy scoring defense. But geez, they play the lowly Raiders. Common sense says they have got to put up some decent fantasy points this week against one of the worst offensive teams in the league. I would think a couple picks and three or four sacks. So why the complete absence in the Team Defense Report? plus the Raiders are on record as saying that they will kick to Hester this week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 plus the Raiders are on record as saying that they will kick to Hester this week Didn't the Colts say the same thing in the SuperBowl? Didn't Dungy say we're going to make a statement by kicking to him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShiznit Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Ok, I know, Chicago has not been playing very good defense lately, epecially fantasy scoring defense. But geez, they play the lowly Raiders. Common sense says they have got to put up some decent fantasy points this week against one of the worst offensive teams in the league. I would think a couple picks and three or four sacks. So why the complete absence in the Team Defense Report? WE SUCK......WHY WOULD YOU START OUR DEFENSE....UNLESS WE ARE PLAYING THE PACKERS!!!!! Yes, I was screaming!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abishagenaden Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 plus the Raiders are on record as saying that they will kick to Hester this week ...who, assuming his 'illness' is contagious and still ailing him, might be sitting in his living room (with whatever illness he has) watching the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdmanJones Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 I have the Bears "DST" and can only refer to it as "ST" or "Hester"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heehawks Posted November 9, 2007 Author Share Posted November 9, 2007 I have them as well and I am starting GB over them. That being said our league is D/ST, so a potential Hester return for TD would obviously help, and makes my decision a bit tougher on who to start. My point really is, I think Chicago D as a fantasy team will do just fine against Oakland, and therefore should have been on the list in some shape or form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heehawks Posted November 14, 2007 Author Share Posted November 14, 2007 So, I think I was correct in my analysis that Chicago D was worth starting this week...4 sacks, 1 int, 2 fum rec, and held Oak to 6 points. They should have at least been on the list! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.