Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

How does your league seed the playoffs?


billay
 Share

Recommended Posts

I commish my local league and I have been looking at tinkering with how I seed teams in the playoffs. We are a 12 team league with 6 teams making the playoffs, 3 division champs and 3 wildcards (best 3 records) The top 2 division champs receive a first round bye. In the past I have used the following logic: that the best division champ out not have to be paired with the 3rd division champ in their bracket and the 3rd division champ ought not to have to play the best wildcard. Seems logical right? That way, DC1 plays the winner of the WC1 vs. WC2 game and DC2 plays the winner of the DC3 vs. WC3 game.

 

With a few exceptions, this format has worked out ok over the years. This year, however, that doesn;t look like it is going to be the case. One division is putrid, and the other 2 divions house, far and away, the top 4 teams in the league. It is possible that the best team will end up in the WC1 spot, which would really suck for DC1. If I won my division and had the best record in the league had to play the league powerhouse in my first playoff game, I'd be pissed. I know that some leagues reseed for the playoffs based upon certain criteria, and others probably establish position by means other than winners of divisions and best records.

 

So what does your league do? Is this just a fluke of this year? Is the logic sound and we ride it out? Or is there a more fair way to handle it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same way here. Reseeding always lets the top team get the worst of what's left. Just like the NFL and IMO the fairest way to do it.

This is the best way to go. Takes some of the fun out of the release of the bracket, but also takes out the chance that "the real superbowl" is held in an earlier round of the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here..it is the best way to go......

 

Not necessarily...its all preference.

 

We like to do it like the pros, with two "conferences".

 

Two conferences of six teams. Winner of each conference earns a bye. #2 plays #3 in Round 1. Winner plays confrence champ for right to represent conference in Super Bowl.

 

We try to keep it as realistic as we can to the pros. Under the other "re-seed" options listed above, two teams from the same division could end up facing each other in the Super Bowl, which to our league makes no sense in trying to make FF as realisitc as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 team division league. 3 division winners and 3 wildcards.

 

top 2 division winners get 1st rd byes

 

3 plays 6, 4 plays 5 then we reseed. No brackets.

 

The #1 seed gets a +4 "home field advantage" in the 2nd rd, and the #2 seed gets a +2 advantage. This has worked well in our league. It mimics a home field advantage as we try to mimic the NFL as much as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily...its all preference.

 

We like to do it like the pros, with two "conferences".

 

Two conferences of six teams. Winner of each conference earns a bye. #2 plays #3 in Round 1. Winner plays confrence champ for right to represent conference in Super Bowl.

 

We try to keep it as realistic as we can to the pros. Under the other "re-seed" options listed above, two teams from the same division could end up facing each other in the Super Bowl, which to our league makes no sense in trying to make FF as realisitc as possible.

 

 

You could be giving a bye to a winner of a conference that is weak though..That conference winner might have a worse record then the runner up in the other conference..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One division is putrid, and the other 2 divions house, far and away, the top 4 teams in the league.

Exactly why 12 team lgs should have 2 divisions, not 3. I would also go top 2 div winners and 2 WCs (half the teams making it sound stupid in an NHL kind way) but just IMO.

 

For your situation, I wouldn't change just because of one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I commish my local league and I have been looking at tinkering with how I seed teams in the playoffs. We are a 12 team league with 6 teams making the playoffs, 3 division champs and 3 wildcards (best 3 records) The top 2 division champs receive a first round bye. In the past I have used the following logic: that the best division champ out not have to be paired with the 3rd division champ in their bracket and the 3rd division champ ought not to have to play the best wildcard. Seems logical right? That way, DC1 plays the winner of the WC1 vs. WC2 game and DC2 plays the winner of the DC3 vs. WC3 game.

 

With a few exceptions, this format has worked out ok over the years. This year, however, that doesn;t look like it is going to be the case. One division is putrid, and the other 2 divions house, far and away, the top 4 teams in the league. It is possible that the best team will end up in the WC1 spot, which would really suck for DC1. If I won my division and had the best record in the league had to play the league powerhouse in my first playoff game, I'd be pissed. I know that some leagues reseed for the playoffs based upon certain criteria, and others probably establish position by means other than winners of divisions and best records.

 

So what does your league do? Is this just a fluke of this year? Is the logic sound and we ride it out? Or is there a more fair way to handle it?

i would say that you should run it like you have if that has worked....i dont think you can or should re-tool it for this yr just because the matchup will suck

 

we have 2 conferences with 4 team divisions.....2 div winners and 1 WC from each conf make the playoffs....one div winner(best record) from each conf gets a bye.

 

edit: and we give the home team(better record) a .5 advantage in case of a tie

Edited by keggerz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 teams make it

 

Top 2 get byes

3 plays 6

4 plays 5

 

Then we re seed after the wildcard rd

 

 

Same here..it is the best way to go......

 

 

First of all if you have not "set" your seeding for this year, i would think you would want to take a league vote as this could piss off a few owners that end up with a bad matchup.

 

We do the same format as above and it has worked out well. One thing that I have found is that the W3 (6 seed) many years is the hottest team going into the playoffs, beats D3 (3 seed) which is usually a team in the worst division, only in due to a weak division!! W3 faces D1 and D2 winner gets a better matchup. We have looked at changing, but have not found a fair solution that aligns with the NFL format.

 

We also do a toilet bowl for the bottom 6 for a few bucks, it tends to keep the 2-8 teams a bit more focused down the stretch, same seeds as the big money side.

Edited by Bonedaddies
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My local:

12 teams

8 keepers (used to be 10 keepers)

3 divisions

8 teams make the playoffs

The other 4 teams are in the toilet bowl and the picks for the following draft are already determined for the toilet bowl teams. The playoff bound teams draft is based on playoff results.

 

Division winners get the top three seeds. The rest is based on record and then head-to-head and then total points.

 

It keeps all teams active until the end. We also play a double-header in the final week which greatly affects the standings. In many years, the eighth seed ends up beating the one seed. The eight seed ends up getting hot at the end and keeps on going. In seven years, the eight seed has won the league twice. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could be giving a bye to a winner of a conference that is weak though..That conference winner might have a worse record then the runner up in the other conference..

 

Which is kinda like the NFL....happens all the time.

 

For argument sake, suppose the Pats had lost a few games this year....theoretically, both the Packers and Cowboys could enter the playoffs with a better record than the winner of the other AFC. So what?

 

And just like the NFL, we keep our conferences the same every year, so the ebb and flow of which conference is better changes from year to year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all if you have not "set" your seeding for this year, i would think you would want to take a league vote as this could piss off a few owners that end up with a bad matchup.

 

We do the same format as above and it has worked out well. One thing that I have found is that the W3 (6 seed) many years is the hottest team going into the playoffs, beats D3 (3 seed) which is usually a team in the worst division, only in due to a weak division!! W3 faces D1 and D2 winner gets a better matchup. We have looked at changing, but have not found a fair solution that aligns with the NFL format.

I would definately put it up for a vote.

 

This is the main problem that we have had in the past, that the DC2 gets a more favorable matchup than than DC1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My local is a 12 team league. 2 conferences. 2 divisions per conference (4 divisions total, 3 teams each).

 

Each division winner is in the playoffs. There are then two wildcards that go to the top team in each conference that did not win their division. This is a lot of fun, because it allows for both small scale rivalry (division) and larger scale (conference). The top team in the conference gets a bye in the first week of the playoffs. The other division winner plays the wildcard team from their conference. I like this layout a lot. The only change I would like to make is to have set divisions rather than redrawing them every season, which we do for fairness I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information