Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Hackett done for year?


i_am_the_swammi
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hadn't seen this posted, and its not a confirmed report, but...any Seahawks homers with some more detailed info?

 

 

Seahawks | Hackett misses practice Wednesday

Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:51:56 -0800

 

Seattle Seahawks WR D.J. Hackett (ankle) missed the team's practice Wednesday, Nov. 28, and is out for at least a couple of weeks. It is possible he will miss the remainder of the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd hate to cut Hackett if he'll be back at any point in the fantasy playoffs, but with the best possible scenario being out two weeks, that has him back in week 15. If he misses another game, that would mean he'll be back for week 16. I think I'm going to drop him to try to get another WR for playoff depth. This season has been brutal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if he's back in 2 weeks I'd have 0 confidence sticking him in my lineup during fantasy playoffs.

His first game back from the same injury earlier this season, he caught 8 for 101/1. I'd start him coming off that injury again.

Edited by Sturphy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His first game back from the same injury earlier this season, he caught 8 for 101/1. I'd start him coming off that injury again.

 

I believe his first game back was in week 9 @ Cleveland where he went 6-58 and a td. Not bad but that was after missing 7 weeks. Its one thing to throw a guy out there in the FF regular season and possibly take a donut. I just wouldn't risk it in my FF playoffs (especially only after 2 weeks if the first time it took him 2 months to fully come back).

 

But hey, thats just me.

Edited by myhousekey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe his first game back was in week 9 @ Cleveland where he went 6-58 and a td. Not bad but that was after missing 7 weeks. Its one thing to throw a guy out there in the FF regular season and possibly take a donut. I just wouldn't risk it in my FF playoffs (especially only after 2 weeks if the first time it took him 2 months to fully come back).

 

But hey, thats just me.

My bad. Looked at the wrong week.

 

You're right, it's risky. Depends on your alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burleson was showing some promise about a month ago. He has since regressed. The light in his head is not on. He hadn't hurt us until last week, and Hasselbeck hadn't been shy about giving him the ball. Knowing how stubborn Matt is, he isn't going to look at Burleson unless he totally has to. Great returner, but what a waste of talent at WR. Just makes me sick. Wake up, idiot.

 

Hackett's injury isn't related to his last one. His last was the 6-week high ankle, this is more of the basketball ankle sprain. He is in a boot, but the team is saying 2-3 weeks, not 4-6. Once he's back, if healthy, he will perform. Don't drop him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hackett's injury isn't related to his last one. His last was the 6-week high ankle, this is more of the basketball ankle sprain.

 

 

Link? All the stuff I've seen is along these lines:

 

Seattle's revolving door at wide receiver took another turn as wide receiver D.J. Hackett will miss at least two weeks after reinjuring the right ankle he hurt in the season opener.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burleson has yet to earn Matt's trust in running routes in the WCO. Hass threw an INT last week and Burleson got an earful on the sideline by the coaches.

 

I would hate to get an earful from Holmgren. That dude is scary when he's angry.

 

Hackett's injury isn't related to his last one. His last was the 6-week high ankle, this is more of the basketball ankle sprain. He is in a boot, but the team is saying 2-3 weeks, not 4-6. Once he's back, if healthy, he will perform. Don't drop him.

 

Good thing you didn't bet me that Hackett would lead the team in any meaningful receiving category. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information