kingfish247 Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Not sure if others are in a similar situation... but I was starting Warner over Brees today based on the matchup. One has to think that Fitz being out will hurt Warner this week too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose228 Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 how many went by the espn report and benched Larry for a early game WR?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted December 2, 2007 Author Share Posted December 2, 2007 how many went by the espn report and benched Larry for a early game WR?? Have B Johnson in for him until I hear anything different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Return Of S&B Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Not sure if others are in a similar situation... but I was starting Warner over Brees today based on the matchup. One has to think that Fitz being out will hurt Warner this week too. Bryant Johnson is probably the best #3 receiver the league...he's no Fitz, but the drop in talent isnt big (he's a former 1st or 2nd rounder). The only thing that will keep Warner from having a big game against the high scoring Browns will be himself. I am starting Warner and Johnson (in place of Fitz) this week...hopefully it pays off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gros Membres! Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Waiting and may plug in C. Henry. Right now, I am leaning that way regardless as it seems this one could limit him even if he does play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Bryant Johnson is probably the best #3 receiver the league...he's no Fitz, but the drop in talent isnt big (he's a former 1st or 2nd rounder). The only thing that will keep Warner from having a big game against the high scoring Browns will be himself. I am starting Warner and Johnson (in place of Fitz) this week...hopefully it pays off I'd say Chris Henry is as long as he isn't suspended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Return Of S&B Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I'd say Chris Henry is as long as he isn't suspended. Yeh, I'd say Chris is pretty solid also, as long as he stays out of trouble Bryant and Henry would make a pretty sold 1-2 WR tandem on most current NFL teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachharry Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I benched Fitz for Coles. I had no choice as Fitz was the only late game WR I had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Ute Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 how many went by the espn report and benched Larry for a early game WR?? Benched Fitz for my #4 WR... Steve Smith. Looking OK so far with 55 rec. and 21 rushing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Yeh, I'd say Chris is pretty solid also, as long as he stays out of trouble Bryant and Henry would make a pretty sold 1-2 WR tandem on most current NFL teams. Well llet's see, Bobby Engram, Wes Welker(Stallworth is listed as the #2) Crayton(Glenn stil the #2) Calvin Johnson(Furrey listed as #2) Anthony Gonzalez All good choices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted December 2, 2007 Author Share Posted December 2, 2007 (edited) He's been officially ruled inactive according to nfl.com and the Cardinals website. Cardinals Inactives QB Tim Hasselbeck (3rd QB) WR Larry Fitzgerald FB Tim Castille FS Aaron Francisco G/T Elton Brown WR Jerheme Urban DE Bo Schobel DT Ross Kolodziej Edited December 2, 2007 by myhousekey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachharry Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I'm glad a final decision has been made, I can quit worrying now. This is the 1st round of playoffs for my league, sure could have used him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF409ers Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 (edited) He's been officially ruled inactive according to nfl.com and the Cardinals website. Cardinals Inactives QB Tim Hasselbeck (3rd QB) WR Larry Fitzgerald FB Tim Castille FS Aaron Francisco G/T Elton Brown WR Jerheme Urban DE Bo Schobel DT Ross Kolodziej Thanks for the update - I am going to roll with Bryant Johnson EDIT TO ADD: Over Chad Johnson Edited December 2, 2007 by SF409ers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splotchman Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Thanks for the update - I am going to roll with Bryant Johnson EDIT TO ADD: Over Chad Johnson +1. I am taking my chances on starting Bryant Johnson in a shootout over Chad in bad weather. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Fanball.com is reporting it too. Cardinals: Fitzgerald out The News Cardinals wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald (groin) is inactive for Sunday's game against the Browns. Bryant Johnson will presumably start in his place. Our View That's bad news for Kurt Warner, but the Cards should still have some success against a porous Browns pass defense. Johnson now makes a decent start in larger fantasy leagues. I'm going with Johnson in two leagues, because I'm desperate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted December 2, 2007 Author Share Posted December 2, 2007 Thanks for the update - I am going to roll with Bryant Johnson +1.....all aboard the Bryant Johnson bandwagon! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.