BillyBalata Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Dallas doesnt have a single tainted title, Drew Pearson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 you need to play the role of victim to deflect negative attention. They are playing the role of 16-0, thanks to Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 They are playing the role of 16-0, thanks to Moss. They're 17-0, WaterTard. I'm surprised that you don't even know your new favorite team's record. Actually, I'm not surprised at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 (edited) They're 17-0, WaterTard. I'm surprised that you don't even know your new favorite team's record. Actually, I'm not surprised at all. I was talking about the season. Boy, flip out over one win. Edited January 17, 2008 by WaterMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fballfreak Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 When was Beldsoe on his way out, after Belicheat was fired. My point exactly. Every team praises their backup QB and the backup QB is usually the most popular player on a terrible team. Without the Tuck rule, the Pats lose the ball and its ball game. So wrong again. But then, we are used to that. What exactly am I jealous of. My teams history isnt 7 years old. My team isnt talked about with a * for cheating, and my team didnt just lose 500K from our coach, 250K from the franchise and its 1st round draft pick. So what you are saying is since cheating works, obviously by the Pats success this decade and this yr, everyone should do it. Geez, maybe Barry Bonds does have a home in 2008 after all, if he isnt in jail. Dallas doesnt have a single tainted title, let alone 3 and this yr.. They have been winning SBs over a 30 year span, and are the most recognizable, marketable, popular franchise in professional sports. Whats funny is Belicheat makes Jerry Jones look like a choir boy. Whod have thunk that was possible? ahahaha ahahaha you crack me up with your hatred and jealousy toward NE your POV is hilarious and border line moronic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 When was Beldsoe on his way out, after Belicheat was fired. My point exactly. Every team praises their backup QB and the backup QB is usually the most popular player on a terrible team. Without the Tuck rule, the Pats lose the ball and its ball game. So wrong again. But then, we are used to that. What exactly am I jealous of. My teams history isnt 7 years old. My team isnt talked about with a * for cheating, and my team didnt just lose 500K from our coach, 250K from the franchise and its 1st round draft pick. So what you are saying is since cheating works, obviously by the Pats success this decade and this yr, everyone should do it. Geez, maybe Barry Bonds does have a home in 2008 after all, if he isnt in jail. Dallas doesnt have a single tainted title, let alone 3 and this yr.. They have been winning SBs over a 30 year span, and are the most recognizable, marketable, popular franchise in professional sports. Whats funny is Belicheat makes Jerry Jones look like a choir boy. Whod have thunk that was possible? every team praises their backup qb and the backup qb is usually the most popular player on a terrible team? lol....brady was gettin press when he was the 4th string qb his rookie year...he was behind drew, john friesz, and michael bishop....then he worked his way to becoming the backup in 2001...you are so clueless....you act as if you know what was going on in new england...or what is going on....lol the after the ruled incompletion...the raiders still had a possession with the lead...in fact they were in a 3rd and 2 situation...with zack crockett and ty wheatley in the backfield...and got nothing on two tries.. when tom and bill are done...they will have accomplished what took dallas 30 years to...lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 when tom and bill are done...they will have accomplished what took dallas 30 years to...lol new england is 3-2 in super bowls. dallas is 5-3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Back on topic, I heard this AM that in addition to being there for the coin toss at Gillette that Indy officials were thinking of bringing her in to start/ride in the pace car at the Indy 500. It's getting a little much but talk about awesome...... to the Colts..... did I just write that.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 PLUUUUUUUZZZEEEE. This hype machine in NE has been hated by the rest of the country for years. Those who disagree are in denial. NE got their first SB because of a bogus tuck rule. Do you not think Oakland fans hate those cheating bast@rds as well. Whats sad is Bledsoe got hurt. Belicheat was coming off a 5-11 season and well on his way to another, and out the door had Bledsoe not got injured. Brady would still be on the NE bench had it not been for this one injury. If Belicheat was so smart why wasnt he starting Brady to begin with. Brady made Belicheat. Before that he was about to be fired by a 2nd NFL franchise with a losing record as NFL coach. i know this will make hell freeze over but for the most part......+1 and keggerz, your +1, is really disappointing. i thought you knew better. my +1 is mainly about the following: "Hate" towards pats with regards to time Tuck rule helped the pats get to the SB(which they won FAIR AND SQUARE...but "probably" wouldnt have had the chance if not for the "tuck",imo) I think OAK has fans that hate NE. It is sad that Bledsoe ALMOST DIED(and imo, even sadder that FOREVER IN DEBT TO MO LEWIS is a user name for a pats fan but he and i have gone at it in the past about how i feel his user name is tasteless...maybe if it was Forever In Debt To "Person that scouted and suggested to draft brady" would have been a better user name and much more tasteful, imo) Arguing who made the team: Brady or Bill is like arguing the chicken and the egg but Bill doesn't have a very lustrous record pre-Brady. I dont know if he was about to be fired after that season or not(just dont remember) all of that is why i said "for the most part" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pig devilz Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 my +1 is mainly about the following: "Hate" towards pats with regards to time Tuck rule helped the pats get to the SB(which they won FAIR AND SQUARE...but "probably" wouldnt have had the chance if not for the "tuck",imo) I think OAK has fans that hate NE. It is sad that Bledsoe ALMOST DIED(and imo, even sadder that FOREVER IN DEBT TO MO LEWIS is a user name for a pats fan but he and i have gone at it in the past about how i feel his user name is tasteless...maybe if it was Forever In Debt To "Person that scouted and suggested to draft brady" would have been a better user name and much more tasteful, imo) Arguing who made the team: Brady or Bill is like arguing the chicken and the egg but Bill doesn't have a very lustrous record pre-Brady. I dont know if he was about to be fired after that season or not(just dont remember) all of that is why i said "for the most part" phew!....thats cool...i'm glad there's some distance in there and not total agreement with the village idiot.... just for the record... FIDTMO is an understandable name. makes sense and i dont think its malicious. Forever In Debt To Dick Rehbein (rest his soul) just doesnt have the same ring to it... Brady was a game or games away from unseating Bledsoe before the injury...Bill was growing more and more tired of Bledsoe's performances. don't forget, this was the same Belichick that let Kosar go in favor of Testaverde in Cleveland.... and no, he wasnt about to be fired. that just makes me LOL!...the scenario and reasoning of why Bob Kraft hired Bill are well documented. Bill was just begining to overhaul the team/organization and (in retrospect) build the SB challenging team we know today. but hey, knowledge and fact never stood in the way of the village idiot before, so why would it now... everybody is entitled to their opinion, it just amazes me that this idiot writes for any website... :shakeshead: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 phew!....thats cool...i'm glad there's some distance in there and not total agreement with the village idiot.... just for the record... FIDTMO is an understandable name. makes sense and i dont think its malicious. Forever In Debt To Dick Rehbein (rest his soul) just doesnt have the same ring to it... Brady was a game or games away from unseating Bledsoe before the injury...Bill was growing more and more tired of Bledsoe's performances. don't forget, this was the same Belichick that let Kosar go in favor of Testaverde in Cleveland.... and no, he wasnt about to be fired. that just makes me LOL!...the scenario and reasoning of why Bob Kraft hired Bill are well documented. Bill was just begining to overhaul the team/organization and (in retrospect) build the SB challenging team we know today. but hey, knowledge and fact never stood in the way of the village idiot before, so why would it now... everybody is entitled to their opinion, it just amazes me that this idiot writes for any website... :shakeshead: yeah im suprised considering some of the sh1t this guy spews...that DMD endorses him....maybe the cowboy fan bond is too strong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigrocks Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 new england is 3-2 in super bowls. dallas is 5-3. New England was a complete joke as AFC representative in their first 2 Super Bowls. Neither team belonged there and it showed when the games were played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 New England was a complete joke as AFC representative in their first 2 Super Bowls. Neither team belonged there and it showed when the games were played. Not sure I'd go that far, the the AFC was indeed pretty weak in '85 and '96. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 yeah im suprised considering some of the sh1t this guy spews...that DMD endorses him....maybe the cowboy fan bond is too strong i dont think you are talking about me but i am not a cowboy fan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.