CaptainHook Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 According to neworleanssaints.com depth charts . . . Devery Henderson is the starter opposite Colston? Is that correct??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampSampson Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Yes, correct. Meachem has been inconsistent. I noticed a drop in the Huddle's ranking too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 How is this surprising? I've been wondering why people have been hyping Meacham and blowing off Henderson all summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cory_n_az Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 Dunno about Henderson, but Meachem's definitely been a bit overrated this offseason. He's going to be behind Patten at the very least. With Bush/Colston/Shockey/Patten, I think you're looking at scraps thereafter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 2, 2008 Author Share Posted September 2, 2008 How is this surprising? I've been wondering why people have been hyping Meacham and blowing off Henderson all summer. I dunno . . . maybe because Henderson had 20 catches for 409 yards last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 2, 2008 Author Share Posted September 2, 2008 I wasn't concerned about Meacham, it's Patton that I'm surprised isn't starting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 2, 2008 Author Share Posted September 2, 2008 Actually I'm just surprised that Henderson is starting at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted September 2, 2008 Share Posted September 2, 2008 I dunno . . . maybe because Henderson had 20 catches for 409 yards last year? um wasn't he dinged up, paving the way for Patten to step up as WR2 which otherwise wouldn't have been available? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 2, 2008 Author Share Posted September 2, 2008 (edited) He started nine games. According to NFL.com he played in all 16. If by "dinged up" you meant "sucked", then yes. He was "dinged up" last year. 20 freakin' catches. (Can you tell I drafted him last year yet?) Edited September 2, 2008 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 My bad then. um yeah I can't believe Henderson is starting either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
major-tom Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 You would think in that offense with Brees, Colston, and Bush the #2 receiver would have a little more success. Maybe not enough plays left over especially now with Shockey in the mix. Henderson had a couple big games 2 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.