muck Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 Well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Someone Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 10-12. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 10-12...their run game and run D is THAT good. I lean more towards the over/under of 9.5 for the Vikes, because they still haven't proven they can pass (their major upgrade on offense was Bernard Berrian ) or stop the pass. Having the Williamses clogging up the middle isn't much good when the QB can just lob it over them to a WR streaking free downfield. Jared Allen should at least drop some QBs on the front end of the pass D, but I still think the secondary is suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 10-12...their run game and run D is THAT good. I lean more towards the over/under of 9.5 for the Vikes, because they still haven't proven they can pass (their major upgrade on offense was Bernard Berrian ) or stop the pass. Having the Williamses clogging up the middle isn't much good when the QB can just lob it over them to a WR streaking free downfield. Jared Allen should at least drop some QBs on the front end of the pass D, but I still think the secondary is suspect. A good pass rush can make your mediocre DB's look like hall of famers, just look at what the Giants did in the playoffs last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.