conehead116 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 (edited) The league never mentioned intent because they cannot prove intent. The minute they mention the word intent it gives legal grounds for Wilfork to pursue action against the league through the players union. By not claiming he had intent to injure they avoided this, but still implied it by levying the fine. Edited September 10, 2008 by conehead116 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.