forever in debt to mo lewis Posted October 12, 2008 Share Posted October 12, 2008 wow....just wow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted October 12, 2008 Author Share Posted October 12, 2008 my lord....this was what? 17-6?? lolol.....god Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 12, 2008 Share Posted October 12, 2008 (edited) EDIT: Never mind, I'm in the wrong thread Edited October 12, 2008 by Gunther Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted October 12, 2008 Author Share Posted October 12, 2008 1st n goal from the 7 after picking off osullivan...and they settle for a fg.....It's raining men! Hallelulah! It's raining men! is wrong with these guys? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doors27 Posted October 12, 2008 Share Posted October 12, 2008 Eagles storm back from 26-17 and win 40-26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scourge Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Reid is terrible. We were lucky to win today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Reid is terrible. We were lucky to win today. After two weeks of being unlucky, we were due. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 We do this against a better team and we lose. This is a good time for the bye week to come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 And that last defensive TD cost me one game, maybe 2. Thanks 9ers and Eagles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scourge Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 After two weeks of being unlucky, we were due. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid... There was nothing unlucky about those losses. Reid's play calling was terrible in both those games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Stop drinking the Kool-Aid... There was nothing unlucky about those losses. Reid's play calling was terrible in both those games. +1, plus the 2 teams were much more physical....the team was unprepared to play a full game of football in both cases and they needed a bye asap... now we'll face a young Atlanta team coming off a bye in a game where we should win, but the defense is not looking the same as the one I saw 3 and 4 weeks ago....they are more or less playing like they don't have to show up and live off the reputation of a few weeks ago.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 And here I was thinking the Atlanta game was a gimme. Not so anymore. Atlanta is looking real good right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 And here I was thinking the Atlanta game was a gimme. Not so anymore. Atlanta is looking real good right now. yeah, I had us making a run after the bye and schooling a young Falcons team.... I'm not so sure about that anymore...but if any team is resilient enough to bounce back, it's the Eagles... but Reid has to acknowledge that his playcalling is bad at best... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Maybe I am drinking the kool aid, but I still think the only team that beat the Eagles physically was Washington. They slugged it out with both Dallas and Chicago to, basically, draws, and lost both those games on mental errors/execution (Mcnabbs poor INT vs. Dallas, poor play calling against the Baers 1st & goal). That being said, I am even-keeled enough to know the Eagles have been without much of their skill-position players for some/all fo the year thus far, and it will be great to see the team fully healthy in two weeks. Honestly, how well would the following teams be: Dallas: no Barber, Owens & Crayton Indy: no Addai, Wayne & Harrison Redskins: no Portis, Moss & Cooley Chargers: no LT, Chambers & Jackson Saints: no Bush, Colston & Moore Giants: no Jacobs, Burress & Toomer Green Bay: no Grant, Jennings & Driver Pitt: no Foster, Ward & Holmes ...and I didn't even mention each of those teams being without an All-Pro guard. Could go on and on....I think the Eagles have managed well to go 3-3 without most of their skill-position players....aside from some bad play calling, and worse exceution, they could be 5-1. They have lost 3 games, all three by less than 6 points each, and each with a great chance to win. I see them throttling the Falcons here, at home, assuming all missing parts are healthy and playing. Jimmy Johnson will toy with Matt Ryan. Eagles 31, Falcons 17. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 You're putting Reggie Brown in an analysis with names like Wayne, Harrison, Owens, Burress, Chambers, Colston, Jennings, Moss, etc.? That is priceless. You are definitely drinking the Kool-Aid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FishFreak Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 You're putting Reggie Brown in an analysis with names like Wayne, Harrison, Owens, Burress, Chambers, Colston, Jennings, Moss, etc.? That is priceless. You are definitely drinking the Kool-Aid. True, a very bad comparison but still being without so many skilled players for multiple weeks is difficult to deal with. The Eagles O will be a handful when fully healthy IF that ever happens. A big concern is their D. It's like night and day. Awesome at home, vulnerable on the road. A little consistency and the Eagles could roll. The schedule isn't difficult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 You're putting Reggie Brown in an analysis with names like Wayne, Harrison, Owens, Burress, Chambers, Colston, Jennings, Moss, etc.? That is priceless. the analysis is more to the fact that the Eagles are without their starting players, and the quality of those that must step into those roles. Christ, we had to start a combo of Greg Lewis/Jason Avant for five weeks....enough said. Take any of the teams I mentioned, take out the starters I listed, and sub in Correll Buckhalter, Jason Avant and Greg Lewis. Romo, Manning, etc. don't look anywhere near as menacing. That was more the point I was making, not that Reggie Brown is Reggie Wayne. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Pitt: no Foster, Ward & Holmes Barry Foster ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Barry Foster ??? Jodie Foster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bark Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Brown and Curtis being out may have been a good thing for the Eagles D. Jackson got to play a much bigger role because of it and proved he is legit I don't think he gets as much of a chance without Curtis and Brown being out since Reid doesn't like to play rookie wideouts because the Offense is sooo hard to learn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.