Skippy Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 This is an honest question. Do you think it would have been Fitz for what he did in the 4th? Boldin went under the radar but had a pretty decent game. The pick sort of kills Warner who in my opinion did not have a very good game until the 4th. No one of the defense stood out that much to me at this point. I guess it would have had to be Fitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABearWithFurniture Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think Warner should have gotten MVP even though they lost...it's a shame they only give it to a player on the winning team now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skippy Posted February 2, 2009 Author Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think Warner should have gotten MVP even though they lost...it's a shame they only give it to a player on the winning team now. Even with the two picks. I don't think that I would have given it to Warner over Ben. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K.Trey Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I agree with Bear, I think Warner was the best player yesterday. 375 and 3 tds vs Pitt is better then anyone did against them all year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriots Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think that the interception was the play of the game and that should have won the MVP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 (edited) I agree with Bear, I think Warner was the best player yesterday. 375 and 3 tds vs Pitt is better then anyone did against them all year. Over Fitzgerald for the Cards side, as he made a bunch of plays himself at the end to help Warner's numbers? Edited February 2, 2009 by Big John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I would have voted for Warner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think Warner should have gotten MVP even though they lost...it's a shame they only give it to a player on the winning team now. +1 Even Harrison's pick wasn't a poor throw...it was a short slant, and Warner had to release it within 1-2 seconds. Now way he could have made that read on the DL dropping into coverage. On that particualr play, give the defense credit...it was an excellent call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Ryan Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Fitz should have won it regardless of who won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF409ers Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think Warner should have gotten MVP even though they lost...it's a shame they only give it to a player on the winning team now. I think Holmes was deserving of the MVP considering the outcome, Ben IMO is 4th behind Fitz / Warner even though they lost. Had the Card's won, it would be a toss up between Warner and Fitz. I can't really justify one over the other, Warner probably gets the nod though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Warner Fitz Holmes Ben Dockett (two sacks) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skippy Posted February 3, 2009 Author Share Posted February 3, 2009 WarnerFitz Holmes Ben Dockett (two sacks) Are you leaving Harrison out on purpose? I am not saying that you need him in there but I am just wondering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Are you leaving Harrison out on purpose? I am not saying that you need him in there but I am just wondering. No. Was on a conference call when I was typing. Forgot about him... Warner Fitz Harrison Holmes Roethlisberger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I would have voted for Warner. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Fitz, but would have been fine if they gave it to Warner, given the circumstances and the fact the QB typically hogs the glory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Are you leaving Harrison out on purpose? I am not saying that you need him in there but I am just wondering. That would have been a shame, given how he looked like a hugh tool later in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skippy Posted February 3, 2009 Author Share Posted February 3, 2009 That would have been a shame, given how he looked like a hugh tool later in the game. I think that is what kept him from getting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 CO MVP's - with Warner and Fitz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 When Warner and Fitz scored that TD, I blurted out "Welcome to the HOF, Fellas!" I heard that Fitz was grumbling a little bit about not getting the ball in the first half so I'd give it to Warner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Btw, there's only been one SB MVP from a losing team. Who is he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Btw, there's only been one SB MVP from a losing team. Who is he? Dan Pastorini? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Btw, there's only been one SB MVP from a losing team. Who is he? Chuck Howley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Chuck Howley Chuck Howley, LB, Dallas in Super Bowl V Bal 16 Dal 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xMRogers Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 The thing about MVP's in all sports, whether season or game, is that while it should be a "full" award, meaning full game / full season...but usually comes down to "what have you done for me lately". Baseball is the worst, in that a hot September can overwhelm 5 months of great play. In this case, (just pretend the Holmes TD was picked for instance), it's a bit odd in that the two likely guys both were pretty quiet early and exploded at same time. I think Warner would have gotten it, but co-MVP's would have been deserved. Hard to go for 2nd most yds ever in an SB and not get it if win the game, but the reason for the win would have been Fitz coming alive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.