Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

2009 compensatory picks


budlitebrad
 Share

Recommended Posts

From PFT:

 

3 (33-97) New England

 

3 (34-98) Cincinnati

 

3 (35-99) Chicago

 

3 (36-100) NY Giants

 

4 (33-133) San Diego

 

4 (34-134) San Diego

 

4 (35-135) Tennessee

 

4 (36-136) Indianapolis

 

5 (33-169) Pittsburgh

 

5 (34-170) New England

 

5 (35-171) San Francisco

 

5 (36-172) Dallas

 

5 (37-173) Tennessee

 

6 (33-206) Tennessee

 

6 (34-207) New England

 

6 (35-2080 Dallas

 

6 (36-209) Cincinnati

 

7 (33-242) Tennessee

 

7 (34-243) Washington

 

7 (35-244) San Francisco

 

7 (36-245) Seattle

 

7 (37-246) Chicago

 

7 (38-247) Seattle

 

7 (39-248) Seattle

 

7 (40-249) Cincinnati

 

7 (41-250) Jacksonville

 

7 (42-251) Chicago

 

7 (43-252) Cincinnati

 

7 (44-253) Jacksonville

 

7 (45-254) Arizona

 

7 (46-255) Detroit

 

7 (47-256) Kansas City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me stoopid, but I don't understand your format here. NFL teams are only allowed 4 compensatory picks and from what I've read NE has 4 and so does SD but you don't list all 4 for either? :wacko:

Edited by tazinib1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Girbril Wilson, Kawika Mitchell, Reggie Tobor...the comp pick isnt awarded for total loss though, they got the third for Wilson...the other two guys were cancelled out by FA signings last year.

 

http://forums.kffl.com/showthread.php?t=247418 explains it all pretty well

 

 

Even after reading the post, and it makes sense, I think it is insane that the Chargers did not get a 3rd round pick for Turner. He was less than 100 yards off the pace to lead the league in rushing only behind AP.

 

The "formula" is seriously flawed if they don't take into account a greater factor for overall impact on the individual team and the league! How does Berrian rate a higher comp pick than Turner. In the real world, I would bet that most teams would rather start a team with Turner than with Berrian! :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even after reading the post, and it makes sense, I think it is insane that the Chargers did not get a 3rd round pick for Turner. He was less than 100 yards off the pace to lead the league in rushing only behind AP.

 

The "formula" is seriously flawed if they don't take into account a greater factor for overall impact on the individual team and the league! How does Berrian rate a higher comp pick than Turner. In the real world, I would bet that most teams would rather start a team with Turner than with Berrian! :wacko:

Agreed. To get a fourth round pick for Turner makes absolutely no sense!!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From PFT:

 

3 (33-97) New England

 

3 (34-98) Cincinnati

 

3 (35-99) Chicago

 

3 (36-100) NY Giants

 

4 (33-133) San Diego

 

4 (34-134) San Diego

 

4 (35-135) Tennessee

 

4 (36-136) Indianapolis

 

5 (33-169) Pittsburgh

 

5 (34-170) New England

 

5 (35-171) San Francisco

 

5 (36-172) Dallas

5 (37-173) Tennessee

 

6 (33-206) Tennessee

 

6 (34-207) New England

 

6 (35-2080 Dallas

 

6 (36-209) Cincinnati

 

7 (33-242) Tennessee

 

7 (34-243) Washington

 

7 (35-244) San Francisco

 

7 (36-245) Seattle

 

7 (37-246) Chicago

 

7 (38-247) Seattle

 

7 (39-248) Seattle

 

7 (40-249) Cincinnati

 

7 (41-250) Jacksonville

 

7 (42-251) Chicago

 

7 (43-252) Cincinnati

 

7 (44-253) Jacksonville

 

7 (45-254) Arizona

 

7 (46-255) Detroit

 

7 (47-256) Kansas City

I don't get this post either. Dallas got 2 picks , a 5th rd and a 6th rd. They now have 11 total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information