chaz13 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Voting for trades is to prevent collusion as others have said. You don't veto trades just because it will make a team better or b/c an owner makes a stupid trade. I make everyone in my league understand that and we have never had a trade vetoed. In fact most people don't even vote. They would only vote if they felt they needed to veto a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 The first problem I see is... an owner can trade any number of future draft picks to win now.... and can then just quit the league. I don't lke the voting idea, but the dynasty leagues I am in require an owner to pay league dues up front for the next year when they want to trade away the future. They win and quit... the dues are paid. That league is in need of rules regarding the tarding of future draft picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Fan Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 um... dude... yeah... eh.... Atomic left a little democracy on your ear. Or is that hair gel? Dude, I'm not goin' out with a loaded gun . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.