Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

veto brees for junk?


kickureface
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do you suspect collusion or stupidity?

 

If you believe collusion--veto trade and both are out of your league next year.

 

If you suspect stupidity--the trade stands. An owner is allowed to be as stupid or as smart as he wants to be. Who are you to tell him how to run his team?

 

--the wisdom of untateve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you suspect collusion or stupidity?

 

If you believe collusion--veto trade and both are out of your league next year.

 

If you suspect stupidity--the trade stands. An owner is allowed to be as stupid or as smart as he wants to be. Who are you to tell him how to run his team?

 

--the wisdom of untateve

 

The Egg is strong in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 team with a qb flex spot. dude is new and accepted brees for hines, julius and mark sanchez. hes also the person the trader invited. and we dont really know him.

Do you know if they guy really exists? Legit or not, I wouldn't play in a league with people that stupid or shady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you suspect collusion or stupidity?

 

If you believe collusion--veto trade and both are out of your league next year.

 

If you suspect stupidity--the trade stands. An owner is allowed to be as stupid or as smart as he wants to be. Who are you to tell him how to run his team?

 

--the wisdom of untateve

 

Agreed with CD...this is one smart egg...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should veto any trade that you don't like. That's why you're the commissioner. You need to let the league members know that you're a dictator so vetoing trades is a great way to do this.

 

Fixed.

 

Don't forget to pay their league fees also since you're telling them how to manage their teams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's funny that you put your roster from an 8 team league in your sig.

 

or anyone that puts their rosters in their sig for that matter. :wacko:

People put their rosters, and often their scoring system in their sigs because it helps when asking for advice because nobody has to ask who else they have on their roster or the relative importance of certain players due to scoring rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should veto any trade that you don't like. That's why you're the commissioner. You need to let the league members know that you command respect, vetoing trades is a great way to do this.

 

I'm trying to put a league together where I get to make the trades for all the teams. This way, I never have to veto them because I know that I am above reproach. Additionally, this removes the pressure from league owners of having to put together trades themselves. I see it as a win-win. I'm all about synergy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to put a league together where I get to make the trades for all the teams. This way, I never have to veto them because I know that I am above reproach. Additionally, this removes the pressure from league owners of having to put together trades themselves. I see it as a win-win. I'm all about synergy.

 

I draft for my guys. Keeps them from having to do too much work and it seems to benefit my team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adrian peterson (minn) for earl bennett non ppr to a bears fan?

would you guys let this through

 

Yep, and then at the end of the year I'd get rid of the Bears owner. Unless they're cheating, you can't veto trades. Why is that so hard for some for you to understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, and then at the end of the year I'd get rid of the Bears owner. Unless they're cheating, you can't veto trades. Why is that so hard for some for you to understand?

Agree, don't play with guys like this. Chalk it up to a lesson learned. Although I would contact the guy giving up Brees and ask Hey Sailor! New in town??? are you thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, and then at the end of the year I'd get rid of the Bears owner. Unless they're cheating, you can't veto trades. Why is that so hard for some for you to understand?

You know, I used to be less on this side of the argument until last year. Mind you, I never went so far as to veto trades, but I'd make a big freaking deal about it when it seemed pretty damned obvious that someone was getting fleeced. I mean, the argument for vetoing this sort of thing often has less to do with protecting players from themselves and more to do with not upsetting the balance of competition for everyone else.

 

However, last year, after a team who actually fleeced the same owner twice in the same season still didn't make the play-offs anyway, I was reminded, "what the hell", it's just a game and you just have to worry about your own chit.

 

That doesn't mean, of course, that you shouldn't give someone a rash of crap about making such a freaking lame trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find notable about these types of threads is the utter indifference people show toward league rules.

 

Is there some type of general clause that applies to all FF leagues that allows/governs vetos? Otherwise, how can you answer the question posed by the OP?

 

:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information