Henry Muto Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 The curse of listening to everyone who tell you from ESPN, to pay sites to free sites is they steer you wrong. Garrard > Palmer !@#$#$!#$ really ? How did that work out ? Not to good for me I tell you. Play Garrard vs a horrible Seattle secondary and sit Palmer vs the stout Baltimore DF. Sure Palmer didn't do much until the final drive but that little he did was a heck of lot better then that crap I had to watch in Seattle called Garrard. How many times are we going to change our own opinions on players and get torched by it before we realize to just go with our own instants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Champ is Here Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 The curse of listening to everyone who tell you from ESPN, to pay sites to free sites is they steer you wrong. Garrard > Palmer !@#$#$!#$ really ? How did that work out ? Not to good for me I tell you. Play Garrard vs a horrible Seattle secondary and sit Palmer vs the stout Baltimore DF. Sure Palmer didn't do much until the final drive but that little he did was a heck of lot better then that crap I had to watch in Seattle called Garrard. How many times are we going to change our own opinions on players and get torched by it before we realize to just go with our own instants. You dont do this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTSuper7 Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 You dont do this? +1 with all the leagues you are in Muto, I can't believe you don't do this. My instincts were that Seattle is tough at home and Garrard just blew his load last week vs the Titans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I usually go with my own instants. Btw, I loved the movie Basic Instants. Am I the only one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delicious_bass Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 The curse of listening to everyone who tell you from ESPN, to pay sites to free sites is they steer you wrong. Garrard > Palmer !@#$#$!#$ really ? How did that work out ? Not to good for me I tell you. Play Garrard vs a horrible Seattle secondary and sit Palmer vs the stout Baltimore DF. Sure Palmer didn't do much until the final drive but that little he did was a heck of lot better then that crap I had to watch in Seattle called Garrard. How many times are we going to change our own opinions on players and get torched by it before we realize to just go with our own instants. I only solicit advice for the 5 under $10K leagues I play in. For the other 62 big money leagues I just trust my gut or flip my lucky coin... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatman Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I usually go with my own instants. Btw, I loved the movie Basic Instants. Am I the only one? I seem to remember a point in that film that instantly made my pants tight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delicious_bass Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I seem to remember a point in that film that instantly made my pants tight. Mike Douglas nekkid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I wont speak for other sites and not even for the huddle but just what I do for the huddle.....I look at all sorts of trends etc and then try to make predictions/suggestions based off of those trends etc.... I do know that for example just about any site worth a dang was saying Winslow was a poor play and that had to do with how well Philly had defended the TE position as well as how much Winslow has yet to do this year....unfortunately, these games are not performed by robots but living breathing people...so there are times that much goes awry compared to what the trends said they should have....it happens because predicting fantasy production is an inexact science...if a site or person has a good line of reasoning for why they say to play or bench someone then I find it hard to fault them for those calls...if they were just throwing stuff up against the wall to see what sticks well that would be a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheikYerbuti Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.