Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Upon Further Review


MustOfBeenDrunk
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm surprised that Steven Jackson didn't even merit discussion in this article ?

John Tuvey has him as only one of five S1's

David Dorey predicts 50 yards rushing with no catches

 

This is the one player I thought would generate the most discussion and nothing ?

Couldn't be a bigger discrepancy but nothing.

Personally I have SJax at 80yards rushing 4 receptions for 40 yards and 1TD so I'm starting him.

Just curious how one could have him as a S1 and the other basically as a bench player and would of loved to here their reasoning.

 

How do others feel he will do this week ,, closer to a S1 or closer to a bench player ?

 

Also I apologize in advance if this shouldn't be discussed in this forum - it's not a WDIS start question

I also understand that it is coming from the pay info but with such a discrepancy it's not like i'm giving anything away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can You say "game time decision"?

 

"Upon Further Review"

 

DMD- He's questionable because of bad spasms, may not play but if he does he very well could be limited and may not finish the game altogether. 50 yards.

 

2V- Even though he's questionable and has been limited in practice, SJax will man up for the game (with the help of some drugs) and perform very well at home against the Seahags. S1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i understand both of your guys points but my question is , usually when there is such a discrepancy the two of them explain there points.

maybe it is as Irish pointed out but maybe not ,, maybe they just have two differant views about how he would fair if healthy and I would of enjoyed to hear from them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did not have one person bring him up.

 

There were only eight names brought up at all and only two that had two people asking.

 

Extremely low week for the UFR names.

 

As indicated above, Jackson is just a major question mark because of his health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did not have one person bring him up.

 

There were only eight names brought up at all and only two that had two people asking.

 

Extremely low week for the UFR names.

 

As indicated above, Jackson is just a major question mark because of his health.

 

 

I suppose Turkey day had a lot to do with that :wacko:

There were a few times I signed on over the last couple of days and we had less than 12 members on. Never seen it so slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information