Jackass Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 If season ended today St. Louis Detroit KC Tampa Washington Cleveland Interestingly 4 of those teams picked in the top 5 last year: Detroit St. Louis KC Seattle Cleveland St. Louis, Washington and Cleveland could pick qb's (i'm assuming KC will stick with Cassell) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Why go on a 3 game winning streak now Cleveland ? ARGGGGGGG I wanted a top 3 pick but I don't they they did as in football teams really don't want a high pick usually because of the money they have to pay out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteteacher2001 Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 If season ended today St. Louis Detroit KC Tampa Washington Cleveland Interestingly 4 of those teams picked in the top 5 last year: Detroit St. Louis KC Seattle Cleveland St. Louis, Washington and Cleveland could pick qb's (i'm assuming KC will stick with Cassell) St. Louis will pick Suh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJV Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 St. Louis will pick Suh! It would make sense to do so BUT they need a QB as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 St. Louis will pick Suh! Only because the HC is a defensive coach. The Rams look like the new Detroit Lions. No QB, no offensive line, no really good WR, weak on the D line and LB spots. I think if I were the Rams I'de trade down, and Suh is the perfect bait for that. They just need too much help at nearly every position on the field. KC might trade up for Suh. So might Cleveland. Suh would be a luxury for the Rams. They have to draft their highest ranked QB. Trading down too far would hurt their chances of getting that QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chadman Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Suh would be a fantastic fit in Kansas City. With all those rabid Suh/Husker fans up the road a little way, it would be great for ticket sales. Not to mention, a great anchor for the defense, which certainly needs help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbforbes Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) It would make sense to do so BUT they need a QB as well. Call me crazy, but I think that St. Louis is going to remedy its QB situation by trading some draft picks (2nd round and perhaps another pick) for Vick. The Rams' and Eagles' offenses are quite similar, and Spags is comfortable making trades with the Eagles. Edited December 28, 2009 by dbforbes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteteacher2001 Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Only because the HC is a defensive coach. The Rams look like the new Detroit Lions. No QB, no offensive line, no really good WR, weak on the D line and LB spots. I think if I were the Rams I'de trade down, and Suh is the perfect bait for that. They just need too much help at nearly every position on the field. KC might trade up for Suh. So might Cleveland. Suh would be a luxury for the Rams. They have to draft their highest ranked QB. Trading down too far would hurt their chances of getting that QB. Hmmmm, the Lions have never gone the route of trimming all old players and going with a youth movement. The Rams have one of the youngest teams in the NFL. I do not see them making Millen like mistakes in the draft, nor will they. Why would you want to trade down to give another team quite possibly the best player to come out of the draft in years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbforbes Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Call me crazy, but I think that St. Louis is going to remedy its QB situation by trading some draft picks (2nd round and perhaps another pick) for Vick. The Rams' and Eagles' offenses are quite similar, and Spags is comfortable making trades with the Eagles. As an update to this post, per today's Rotoworld.com: "Rams expected to consider trade for QB Vick" Beat writer Jim Thomas expects the Rams' brass to discuss the possibility of signing or trading for Michael Vick in next week's organizational meetings. GM Billy Devaney worked with Vick in Atlanta and even visited him in prison. Coach Steve Spagnuolo and OC Pat Shurmur are tight with Eagles coach Andy Reid, who has spoken in glowing terms about the "changes" Vick has made in his life. The Rams desperately need a QB, and Vick would be a good fit in the Edward Jones Dome. Using a late round pick to reel in a QB would allow the Rams to select Nebraska DT Ndamukong Suh with the No. 1 pick. Jan. 15 - 8:50 am et Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch I have to think that the Eagles will score more out such a deal than just a "late round" pick. I guess that we may see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holy Roller Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 As an update to this post, per today's Rotoworld.com: "Rams expected to consider trade for QB Vick" Beat writer Jim Thomas expects the Rams' brass to discuss the possibility of signing or trading for Michael Vick in next week's organizational meetings. GM Billy Devaney worked with Vick in Atlanta and even visited him in prison. Coach Steve Spagnuolo and OC Pat Shurmur are tight with Eagles coach Andy Reid, who has spoken in glowing terms about the "changes" Vick has made in his life. The Rams desperately need a QB, and Vick would be a good fit in the Edward Jones Dome. Using a late round pick to reel in a QB would allow the Rams to select Nebraska DT Ndamukong Suh with the No. 1 pick. Jan. 15 - 8:50 am et Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch I have to think that the Eagles will score more out such a deal than just a "late round" pick. I guess that we may see. Vick becoming a Ram would be justice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 (edited) I have to think that the Eagles will score more out such a deal than just a "late round" pick. Why is that? Edited January 15, 2010 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.