Cowboyz1 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) I can't believe GB didn't Challenge that last possesion as it looked like a replay of the Oakland tuck rule that went against Oak. At least they should have challenged to take a look under the hood instead of going away quitely. Also what was the coach for Baltimore thinking by not challening that punt that hit the back of a Raven and was NOT recovered in bounds by NE. Not that it mattered but that was just poor coaching. Glad about both outcomes but I was very surpised that neither play was challenged. What a great game though in AZ. Rackers off the hook after a bad miss. Edited January 11, 2010 by Cowboyz1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I can't believe GB didn't Challenge that last possesion In overtime it is booth reviews only, and it would have been an int instead of a fumble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I can't believe GB didn't Challenge that last possesion as it looked like a replay of the Oakland tuck rule that went against Oak. At least they should have challenged to take a look under the hood instead of going away quitely. 1st of all, the ball never came close to hitting the ground. 2nd, you can't challenge in overtime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 1st of all, the ball never came close to hitting the ground.2nd, you can't challenge in overtime. That's right all reviews are done in the box in OT, forgot that one and I didn't know the ball didn't hit the ground i stand corrected there but what about the Baltimore vs. NE game where clearly the NE player didn't recover the ball before going out of bounds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 what about the Baltimore vs. NE game where clearly the NE player didn't recover the ball before going out of bounds? missed it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budlitebrad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 The bigger issue was the obvious helmet-to-helmet and facemask right after that would have allowed GB to keep the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh-mongus Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 The bigger issue was the obvious helmet-to-helmet and facemask right after that would have allowed GB to keep the ball. Oh, c'mon now. Just let it go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 The bigger issue was the obvious helmet-to-helmet and facemask right after that would have allowed GB to keep the ball. Yeah that was a bad miss call but both teams had thier chances to say the least. Wow what a game. Was finished right though, on the field with the two sides of the ball that had fought all day instead of a kicker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 That's right all reviews are done in the box in OT, forgot that one and I didn't know the ball didn't hit the ground i stand corrected there but what about the Baltimore vs. NE game where clearly the NE player didn't recover the ball before going out of bounds? In other words you don't have too much of a clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budlitebrad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Oh, c'mon now. Just let it go. It's been 30 minutes. Give me a few hours to vent and I'll be quiet till next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 It's been 30 minutes. Give me a few hours to vent and I'll be quiet till next season. You've run up a hugh score in SPIT so there's something good for ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budlitebrad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 You've run up a hugh score in SPIT so there's something good for ya. Figured it'd be a shootout tonight. Glad I used up Rodgers, Jennings, and Finley this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hoyle Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Per the Helmet to Helmet, it looked like it, but was there actually contact? The Packers Offense was running wild. Just depressing to see the Guru Capers fall flat. Rodgers played well despite the INT and then holding the ball too long again at times. That should have been a facemask at the end of the game. Why wasn't it called? It looked clearly like the Def. had AR's facemask, or was it because once the ball is in the air the Def. can keep them away and it was hands to the face? Not sure. IMHO it was a facemask and GB should have kept the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboyz1 Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 In other words you don't have too much of a clue. thanks for clearing that up for me too Ursa... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.