Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Wes Welker


delfamdelfam
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have Welker as my #1 wide receiver in one of my drafts, and people say my WR's are weak. Just wondering if people think he's a WR1. If he puts up numbers like 100 catches, 1100 yards, and 4 tds in a ppr league, that 226 points, that seems like a WR1 to me.

 

Also by waiting to the third round to get a WR1 you can stock up on top talent at the RB position in rounds 1 and 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantasyfootballcalculator has him at 3.06, is that right by what everyone has seen?

 

Wes Welker last year(ppr stats)

1348 yds, 123 rec, 4 tds, that equals 262.8 points

 

Randy Moss last year(ppr stats)

1264 yds, 83 rec, 13 tds, that equals 261.4

 

Randy Moss is a #1 reciever, so if Welker equals him in points that why is Welker not a #1 reciever fantasy wise? I know he's coming off injury but he seems 100% and even if he's off of what he did last year, he still seems like amazing value in the 3 or 4th round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantasyfootballcalculator has him at 3.06, is that right by what everyone has seen?

 

Wes Welker last year(ppr stats)

1348 yds, 123 rec, 4 tds, that equals 262.8 points

 

Randy Moss last year(ppr stats)

1264 yds, 83 rec, 13 tds, that equals 261.4

 

Randy Moss is a #1 reciever, so if Welker equals him in points that why is Welker not a #1 reciever fantasy wise? I know he's coming off injury but he seems 100% and even if he's off of what he did last year, he still seems like amazing value in the 3 or 4th round.

 

No one is 100% coming off that serious of an ACL injury. Thats his stats when he is healthy, I think they will defiently be diminished. Not a WR1, i would slot him as a WR2 with some risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the pats are smart, and I think they are, they won't give Welker a full load early on. They'd be smart to rest him and get Edilmen and Tate some time. The fact that he's back this fast from the ACL is incouraging, but it makes no sense to give him too many reps early on.

Edited by Capt. Stanky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the pats are smart, and I think they are, they won't give Welker a full load early on. They'd be smart to rest him and get Edilmen and Tate some time. The fact that he's back this fast from the ACL is incouraging, but it makes no sense to give him too many reps early on.

 

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got him in the 5th round. I think he has the potential to be a #1 but he will put up better numbers later in the year and not in the beginning. Maybe that is when you can trade for him. I think he will be a monster in the later weeks. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information