cre8tiff Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 OK JUMbo, that is an interesting read on him... I've been holding Hester, considering how Martz loves his speedy WR/PK guy. However, I do recall he loves his possession receiver even more... hmmm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moopyjiggles Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 pass bennett stinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 pass bennett stinks. I disagree completely...he can overachieve at WR on the Bears - especially in the slot... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUMbotron Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I'd rather have him on my bench - a small upside piece of the Martz pie - than Gage, Chambers, Burleson( hurt), Mike Williams SEA, Housh, etc. You never know. Bennett caught 54 passes for 717 yards & 2 TDs last year despite developing a knee issue in December. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lennykravitz2004 Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 Interesting article I came across. Just some more info to process... Martz offenses succeed no matter where, what, who... it's a matter of finding which player is his "pet" favorite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 (edited) Interesting article I came across. Just some more info to process... Martz offenses succeed no matter where, what, who... it's a matter of finding which player is his "pet" favorite. :beg: Please be Knox, Please be Knos, Please be Knox Edited September 24, 2010 by BearBroncos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 WRBC in it's truest sense. Even Aromashadu had no clue he wasn't in the game plan last week. Any Chicago WR should only be started as a last resort. Hester was a good play last week, and could go invisible this week. The most you'll see for targets will be maybe 8-10 per week per guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 WRBC in it's truest sense. Even Aromashadu had no clue he wasn't in the game plan last week. Any Chicago WR should only be started as a last resort. Hester was a good play last week, and could go invisible this week. The most you'll see for targets will be maybe 8-10 per week per guy. I have Knox and Bennett as WR3 candidates and that's all they should be....and maybe on a bye week, they can both be played....depending on the matchup... there's potential for one stud-like performance out of this group every week... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUMbotron Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2010/09/ma...ashodu_sit.html "Be that as it may, word is Aromashoduce short-armed some balls after absorbing some big hits against the Lions and the coaching staff lost confidence in him going over the middle." Martz awards the guys who hustle and fight - as evidenced by the under-talented Mike Furrey leading the NFC in receptions one year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.