Balzac Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 This may sound a bit odd but here's what I'm thinking - in standard ppr leagues, the Pats backfield has been averaging slightly under 30 points per game on the season. Now that the touches have essentially been trimmed down to 2 guys (BJGE and Woodhead) I think it's a fairly safe bet that if you play both guys, you'll net around 30 points in a given week. The only week where the RBs failed to produce was against the Jets - not surprising. Otherwise, and take a look at the last 3 weeks in particular when it's been just BJGE and Woodhead, it's been a consistent 30ppg. Since Woodhead is eligible at WR in most leagues, plug him in as a WR3 and use BJGE as your flex - pretty good production out of those 2 slots. The Pats are going to put up points, so I'm not overly worried about the RBs not producing (and even if they abandon the run, Woodhead is bound to have a solid game). I, for example, am thinking very hard about doing the above and sitting Driver as my WR3 - I just don't want to deal with the possibility of another partial game from him while also risking playing only 1/2 of the Pats backfield (because with my luck, the guy I sit will be the one who scores more). Craziness or a pretty solid plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delusions of grandeur Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 (edited) Since Woodhead is eligible at WR in most leagues Is this really true? All my leagues are in MFL now, and they have him listed as a RB, as he should be.. In my local, we had actually discussed this before the season about McCluster, and determined that he would need over 50% of his touches to be carries to be considered a RB, instead of WR... We also decided that no player should be a RB/WR, even if the distribution changes from game to game, because it would just be silly. Conversely, this same rule applies to Woodhead, that he would have to have 50% of his touches be passes, to be able to be considered a WR.. But my setup aside, what about a guy who's gotten 22 carries for 141 yards (6.3 AVG), and only 6 passes causes him to be called a WR? How can you consider Forte and Rice "pass-catching backs", but this guy is a WR? And don't tell me it's about his size. The stats say he's performing like a RB. (BTW, to answer the OP's question, if I had no better options, I would be comfortable starting both guys, who've done plenty with their opportunities so far) Edited October 22, 2010 by delusions of granduer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Waterboy Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Interesting idea. Where does Woodhead qualify as a WR? I would've almost certainly grabbed him, especially in my PPR league. Both are sportsline, he looks like an "RB," but mayb you can start him as a WR when you're in your "set lineup" page? If the matchup is right, I'd consider starting both. If it's MIN, PIT, or the NYJ, I'd recommend another plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 he runs way too much to be a WR.... a RB can have 10 catches and still be a RB, but a WR can't run the ball 8-10 a game and still be a WR... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted October 23, 2010 Author Share Posted October 23, 2010 He qualifies as both in both espn and yahoo leagues. The reason is that he was drafted as a rb but was origiinally retained by the Jets as their 4th WR this season (and that's when they set his eligibility). As soon as I saw he was eligible at both after his first game with the Pats, I grabbed him right quick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUMbotron Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I don't know which league hosts are listing Woodhead as a WR but it's a tremendously horrible glitch and your league's commish should manually override. It's the right thing... the only thing to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.